Experiment at Fermilab gave women fewer opportunities to present at conferences.
Women are poorly represented in physics, making up just 10% of faculty in the United States, for example, but the reasons for this have proved contentious. Now a particle physicist claims to have hard data showing institutional sexism at an experiment at one of America's highest-profile physics labs.
Sherry Towers claims that female postdocs worked significantly harder than their male peers but were awarded one-third as many conference presentations proportionally. “There was this shocking difference,” says Towers, who now studies statistics at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. “Particle physics really hasn't moved forward in 30 years.”
Towers used data from publicly available work records to chart the careers of 57 postdoctoral researchers, including nine women, who worked on the 'DZero' particle detector at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, between 1998 and 2006. Towers herself worked as a postdoc on the project between 2000 and 2005. The findings of her survey were striking, she says. She claims that women did 40% more maintenance work than their male counterparts, and that female postdocs produced significantly more 'internal papers' per year. But based on that productivity they were only one-third as likely to be allocated conference talks as their male peers, she claims (http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2026).
Conference presentations are critical to a young particle physicist's career. Papers from collaborations such as DZero have hundreds of authors in alphabetical order. Being given the chance to present results at a meeting is a major way for young researchers to stand out. “It's important,” says Pauline Gagnon, a physicist with the ATLAS detector at CERN near Geneva, Switzerland. “Being able to give talks is a way of rewarding individuals for their work.”
Most particle detectors have internal committees that allocate conference presentations to researchers. These committees are frequently male-dominated, and Towers believes this lies behind the discrimination. “I don't think for a second that there is a conscious bias going on,” she says. But the committees “are in danger of being prone to patronage and cronyism”. Male committee members are more likely to nominate male protégés to receive presentation time, she claims.
Some are sceptical of the findings. “I wasn't convinced that the effect she has found is real,” says Kevin Pitts, a particle physicist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Internal papers are not necessarily a direct measure of productivity, he argues, and the small number of physicists surveyed is not enough to prove systematic bias. But Pitts is quick to add that he has little doubt that females do suffer gender discrimination: “In fact,” he says, “I have personally observed this on more than one occasion.”
Female physicists contacted by Nature said Towers's data matched their personal experiences of institutional sexism in physics. “You often see a young guy with an older guy gossiping and having coffee, but never a woman,” says Freya Blekman, a physicist on the CMS experiment at CERN. “I'm convinced,” agrees Gagnon. “There is absolutely no shadow of a doubt in my mind.” She says the ATLAS collaboration is thinking about how to address the problem in its own speakers' committee.
After Towers complained, Fermilab launched an internal review in autumn 2006, says Bruce Chrisman, the lab's chief operating officer. An edited copy of the review obtained by Nature found that the collaboration “followed its policies correctly”. But the investigator, a senior female physicist, added that complaints of gender discrimination in the group “should not be summarily dismissed”. There was a general feeling that females were being “passed over” for leadership roles, the report says.
DZero's leaders counter that bias, if it ever existed, is not plaguing the current collaboration. A survey of data between August 2006 and 2007 showed that women gave 17% of all talks despite making up just 12% of the collaboration, says DZero spokesman Dmitri Denisov.
Powers says the investigation didn't focus on postdocs and hasn't led to real changes at DZero. She wants the conference allocation system to be made more transparent and balanced. “The changes that need to be made are simple,” she says. “It wouldn't cost them a dime.”
And Towers says gender discrimination ultimately forced her out of particle physics. She adds that in 2004 her former employer, a prominent northeastern public university, tried to terminate her contract after she complained that she wasn't given adequate maternity leave. She has since filed a lawsuit against the university.
About this article
Book Review: Teacher, scholar, mother: Re-envisioning motherhood in the academyYoungA. M. (Ed.). (2015). Teacher, scholar, mother: Re-envisioning motherhood in the academy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 306 pp.$95.00 (hardback). ISBN 9781498503402. $94.99 (e-book). ISBN 9781498503419.
Psychology of Women Quarterly (2017)