Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Improving on haves and have-nots

All-or-nothing targets for global access to basic amenities such as drinking water and sanitation are outdated. The time has come, says Jamie Bartram, for a more fluid approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1


  1. Suárez, R. & Bradford, B. The economic impact of the cholera epidemic in Peru: an application of the cost-of-illness methodology, WASH Field Rep. No. 415 (Water and Sanitation for Health Project, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Snapshot of Sanitation in Africa WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (2008).

  3. Unravelling Sanitation Practices (WHO Geneva & UNICEF New York, 2008).

  4. (2008).

  5. Hutton, G. & Haller, L. Evaluation of the costs and benefits of water and sanitation improvements at the global level (Water, Sanitation and Health Protection of the Human Environment, WHO, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartram, J. Improving on haves and have-nots. Nature 452, 283–284 (2008).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing