Abstract
Despite recent advances, current diagnostic tests and treatment of prostate cancer have limitations. In the last few years, numerous biomolecules have been investigated with the aim of improving diagnosis, including kallikrein-like proteases, growth factors and neuroendocrine markers. Analysis of susceptibility genes has also been a focus of attention. Extensive research into new therapeutic approaches is also underway, including targeting angiogenesis, immune regulation and stromal–epithelial interactions. Gene therapy, gene chip technology and proteomics have emerged as promising innovations. The host of novel diagnostic markers and therapies require appropriate validation, both phenotypical and functional. A further consideration is the need to re-evaluate clinical trial design and end points to facilitate progression of promising targets through the clinical trial process. Overall, the outlook for the treatment of prostate cancer looks promising, with any advances likely to require both a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Huggins C, Hodges C . Studies on prostatic cancer. 1. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res 1941; 1: 293–297.
Aus G et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 97–101.
Thompson I, Leach RJ, Pollock BH, Naylor SL . Prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen: the more we know, the less we understand. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1027–1028.
Cramer SD et al. Association between genetic polymorphisms in the prostate-specific antigen gene promoter and serum prostate-specific antigen levels. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1044–1053.
Galic J et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen in early detection of prostate cancer. Coll Antropol 2003; 27 (Suppl 1): 61–66.
Gleason DF, Mellinger GT . Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 1974; 111: 58–64.
DeMarzo AM, Nelson WG, Isaacs WB, Epstein JI . Pathological and molecular aspects of prostate cancer. Lancet 2003; 361: 955–964.
Allsbrook Jr WC et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 74–80.
Allsbrook Jr WC et al. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. Hum Pathol 2001; 32: 81–88.
Corcoran NM, Costello AJ . Interleukin-6: minor player or starring role in the development of hormone-refractory prostate cancer? BJU Int 2003; 91: 545–553.
Bello-DeOcampo D, Tindall DJ . TGF-betal/Smad signaling in prostate cancer. Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4: 197–207.
Wikstrom P et al. Transforming growth factor beta1 is associated with angiogenesis, metastasis, and poor clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Prostate 1998; 37: 19–29.
Tavtigian SV et al. A candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene at chromosome 17p. Nat Genet 2001; 27: 172–180.
Korver W et al. The product of the candidate prostate cancer susceptibility gene ELAC2 interacts with the gamma-tubulin complex. Int J Cancer 2003; 104: 283–288.
De Marzo AM, Marchi VL, Epstein JI, Nelson WG . Proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate: implications for prostatic carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol 1999; 155: 1985–1992.
Thompson D, Easton DF . Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1358–1365.
The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1310–1316.
Schalken JA, Hessels D, Verhaegh G . New targets for therapy in prostate cancer: differential display code 3 (DD3(PCA3)), a highly prostate cancer-specific gene. Urology 2003; 62 (5 Suppl 1): 34–43.
Fradet Y et al. uPM3, a new molecular urine test for the detection of prostate cancer. Urology 2004; in press.
Watson RW . Gene-chip technology and prostate cancer: the identification of new genes regulating tumour progression. BJU Int 2003; 91: 307.
Ahram M et al. Proteomic analysis of human prostate cancer. Mol Carcinogen 2002; 33: 9–15.
Chakrabarti R, Robles LD, Gibson J, Muroski M . Profiling of differential expression of messenger RNA in normal, benign, and metastatic prostate cell lines. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2002; 139: 115–125.
Luo J et al. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase: a new molecular marker for prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 2220–2226.
Varambally S et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature 2002; 419: 624–629.
Petricoin III EF et al. Serum proteomic patterns for detection of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 1576–1578.
Schalken JA, van Leenders G . Cellular and molecular biology of the prostate: stem cell biology. Urology 2003; 62 (5 Suppl 1): 11–20.
Nicholson B, Theodorescu D . Molecular therapeutics in prostate cancer. Histol Histopathol 2003; 18: 275–298.
Hudes GR . Signaling inhibitors in the treatment of prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs 2002; 20: 159–172.
Steiner MS, Gingrich JR, Chauhan RD . Prostate cancer gene therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002; 11: 607–620.
Chung LW et al. New targets for therapy in prostate cancer: modulation of stromal–epithelial interactions. Urology 2003; 62 (5 Suppl 1): 44–54.
Umbas R et al. Decreased E-cadherin expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 3929–3933.
Tomita K . Cell Adhesion Molecules in Bladder and Prostate Cancer. University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen, 2004.
Cavallaro U, Schaffhauser B, Christofori G . Cadherins and the tumour progression: is it all in a switch? Cancer Lett 2002; 176: 123–128.
Borgstrom P et al. Neutralizing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody completely inhibits angiogenesis and growth of human prostate carcinoma micro tumors in vivo. Prostate 1998; 35: 1–10.
Kumar CC . Integrin alpha v beta 3 as a therapeutic target for blocking tumor-induced angiogenesis. Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4: 123–131.
Brooks PC et al. Integrin alpha v beta 3 antagonists promote tumor regression by inducing apoptosis of angiogenic blood vessels. Cell 1994; 79: 1157–1164.
Horig H, Lee CS, Kaufman HL . Prostate-specific antigen vaccines for prostate cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2002; 2: 395–408.
Nanus DM et al. Clinical use of monoclonal antibody HuJ591 therapy: Targeting prostate specific membrane antigen. J Urol 2003; 170: S84–S89.
Morris MJ, Scher HI . Novel therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer: current clinical trials and development strategies. Surg Oncol 2002; 11: 13–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watson, R., Schalken, J. Future opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7 (Suppl 1), S8–S13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500742
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500742
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The development of a web- and a print-based decision aid for prostate cancer screening
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2010)