Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Immunohistochemical evaluation of the safety of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and its clinical results

Abstract

Short term follow up studies on transurethral electrovaporization (TUEVP) have shown a relative low morbidity over TURP. The use of high power current has been claimed as a source of possible damage on the neuronal structures surrounding the prostate.

The aims of our study were to assess longer follow up results as well as the safety of this technique.

Over an 18 month mean follow up period symptom relief remained relatively stable. Postoperative dysuria was detected in a higher percentage of patients and was seen for a longer period in comparison with previous reports.

Immunohistochemical staining performed using S-100 and NF monoclonal antibodies showed anatomical integrity of the prostatic neuronal fibres surrounding the vaporization edge.

In conclusion, although the effectiveness and safety of TUEVP are confirmed by the present study, the occurrence of a significant rate of long-lasting postoperative irritative symptoms must be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tizzani, A., Gontero, P., Casetta, G. et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of the safety of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate and its clinical results. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2, 16–20 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500268

Keywords

Search

Quick links