Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

White House adviser linked to cuts in climate-change report

Marburger accused of interfering with testimony.

John Marburger says global-warming testimony 'lacked precision'. Credit: AP Photo/Michel Euler

The chief science adviser to President George W. Bush came under fire last week for his role in watering down congressional testimony on the health effects of global warming.

Julie Gerberding, director of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, had briefed senators on the subject at a hearing on 23 October. As required, she submitted her written testimony 24 hours in advance to the White House ? which then proceeded to chop it in half. Detailed comments from the office of John Marburger, the president's science adviser and director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), may have played a part.

Six pages of missing material focused on a range of potential public- health impacts related to climate change. These included the effects of heat waves, air pollution, extreme weather and infectious diseases. The original testimony also indicated that children, the elderly and the poor would bear the brunt of the impact, and suggested that these problems "remain largely unaddressed".

Officials at the Centers for Disease Control maintain that Gerberding's testimony was accurate and complete, especially when combined with what she told the committee verbally. But congressional Democrats and advocacy groups immediately denounced the White House, citing a history of allegations that the administration has misrepresented science in order to promote its own policies.

"Considering the track record, this administration should be bending over backwards to allow critical scientific evidence to reach the public," says Tim Donaghy of the Union of Concerned Scientists, an advocacy group based in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Marburger insists that his office did not seek to cut the report, but instead made "substantive and constructive comments and suggestions". Those comments were passed to the White House Office of Management and Budget, which coordinates such agency reviews. Owing to time constraints, the budget office elected to strike the sections rather than revise the testimony, according to OSTP officials.

Donaghy acknowledges that Marburger's comments are technically accurate, but he says the administration had a responsibility to correct the errors rather than cutting the meat out of the testimony. "The topic of the hearing was climate change and public health," he says. "It's not too much to ask to have them submit testimony on that particular topic."

The budget office referred all questions on the matter to the White House press office, which declined to discuss the issue.

At the time Nature went to press, the OSTP had said that it would not release the full version of its suggested edits, as such reviews were an "internal process". But in a written statement, Marburger offered several examples of what he called an "overall lack of precision" in the proposed testimony, and cited what he claimed were technical conflicts with the latest assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

For instance, Marburger flagged a statement indicating that global warming is expected to alter the "frequency, timing, intensity and duration of extreme weather events such as hurricanes and floods". But researchers have made links between global warming and hurricanes primarily for storm intensity, and even on that point there remains considerable debate.

Marburger also said that the report improperly characterized certain global impacts as domestic impacts, and failed to acknowledge that, in some cases such as agriculture, the impact in the United States might be beneficial.

He also noted that the effects on mental health anticipated by the IPCC relate to post-disaster trauma, not the anticipation of global warming as stated in the testimony. Senator Barbara Boxer (Democrat, California), who chairs the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works that called Gerberding to testify, has asked the White House for copies of all records related to the testimony. She calls Marburger's explanation a "lame defence".


Related links

Related links

Related external links

Union of Concerned Scientists

Senate committee hearing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tollefson, J. White House adviser linked to cuts in climate-change report. Nature (2007).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing