That is the question. The search for a single theory of everything is as old as science itself, and is now the beat of quantum cosmologists. But some basic tenets that inform the quest are being challenged.
This is a preview of subscription content
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.

References
Kachru, S., Kallosh, R., Linde, A. & Trivedi, S. P. Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003).
Susskind, L. preprint available at www.arxiv.org/hep-th/0302219 (2003).
Hawking, S. W. & Hertog, T. Phys. Rev. D 73, 123527 (2006).
Hartle, J. B. & Hawking, S. W. Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960–2975 (1983).
Vilenkin, A. Phys. Rev. D 30, 509–511 (1984).
Schiller, F. reprinted in Hist. Theor. 11, 321–334 (1972).
Griffiths, R. J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219–272 (1984).
Omnès, R. J. Stat. Phys. 53, 893–932 (1988).
Gell-Mann, M. & Hartle, J. B. Phys. Rev. D 47, 3345–3382 (1993).
Joos, E. et al. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bojowald, M. Unique, or not unique?. Nature 442, 988–989 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/442988a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/442988a
Further reading
-
Astrophysics in 2006
Space Science Reviews (2007)