Sir
Your News Feature “The nightmare before funding” (Nature 437, 308–311; 2005), on the horrors of writing grant applications, will strike a chord with researchers everywhere.
To my knowledge there has never been any objective analysis to determine whether or not increasing the complexity in the funding process has improved decision-making by the funding agencies or produced higher-quality research from the recipients of the funds. The only outcome of which we can be certain is that the wasted time makes grant-writers less productive. This in turn means that, for those agencies that burden us with this administrative nonsense, the science base is less competitive. I know this because, in order to keep my own research group running on a relatively modest scale, I have not been able to do an experiment for five years, and I am certainly not alone.
The pessimistic view is that we are now too bogged down in this mess ever to return to a simpler, more sensible way of doing things. I tell my PhD students that the allure of research used to be the intellectual challenge, but nowadays you'd better be up for the administrative challenge too.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moss, S. Main effect of bureaucracy is to reduce productivity. Nature 437, 1089 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/4371089c
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/4371089c