Electron-spin domains (communication arising)

Magnetic enhancement of superconductivity

Article metrics


Movshovich et al. suggest that our calorimetric observation of the FFLO superconducting phase boundary1 and its angular dependence are inconsistent with their own data reporting the possible presence of an FFLO phase, and that we have incorrectly used magnetothermal measurements to identify the order of the FFLO transition. They also contest that the correlation of the magnetization steps with the calorimetrically identified FFLO superconducting phase of CeCoIn5 is coincidental. We consider each of these points in turn.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Radovan, H. et al. Nature 425, 51–55 (2003).

  2. 2

    Bianchi, A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187004 (2003).

  3. 3

    Bianchi, A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137002 (2002).

  4. 4

    Aoki, H. et al. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 16, L13–L19 (2004).

  5. 5

    Ikeda, S. et al. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 70, 2248–2251 (2001).

  6. 6

    Tayama, T. et al. Phys. Rev. B. 65, 180504 (2002).

  7. 7

    Won, H. et al. Preprint at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/cond-mat/0306548〉 (2003).

  8. 8

    Klein, U. Preprint at 〈http://xxx.lanl.gov/cond-mat/0312095〉 (2003).

  9. 9

    Klein, U., Rainer, D. & Shimahara, H. J. Low Temp. Phys. 118, 91–104 (2002).

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to H. A. Radovan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radovan, H., Fortune, N., Murphy, T. et al. Magnetic enhancement of superconductivity. Nature 427, 802 (2004) doi:10.1038/427802b

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.