Atmospheric science

Ultraviolet light and leaf emission of NOx


Nitrogen oxides are trace gases that critically affect atmospheric chemistry and aerosol formation1. Vegetation is usually regarded as a sink for these gases, although nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide have been detected as natural emissions from plants2,3. Here we use in situ measurements to show that solar ultraviolet radiation induces the emission of nitrogen oxide radicals (NOx) from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) shoots when ambient concentrations drop below one part per billion. Although this contribution is insignificant on a local scale, our findings suggest that global NOx emissions from boreal coniferous forests may be comparable to those produced by worldwide industrial and traffic sources.


We measured the amount of NOx emitted from P. sylvestris (NOx flux) at the SMEAR II station in southern Finland4 by enclosing individual young shoots inside a specially equipped chamber5,6. The cover of each chamber was made of ultraviolet-transparent quartz glass (which has a transmittance of over 90% for ultraviolet A and B light) so that the plants were exposed to solar ultraviolet radiation. The chambers were closed 2–3 times every hour for 60 s while the gas concentration inside was being monitored.

We used a mass-balance equation to determine the rate of change in NOx concentration inside the chamber during a single chamber closure. To calculate the NOx flux, the solution to the mass-balance equation was fitted to the measured values6.

The NOx concentration increased during closure in an empty chamber, but increased faster when the chamber contained a shoot (Fig. 1a). Ultraviolet radiation also caused a small amount of NOx emission from the chamber walls, which was taken into account in applying the mass-balance equation.

Figure 1: Ultraviolet radiation induces emission of nitrogen oxides from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) shoots.

a, Increase in NOx concentration inside an experimental chamber with an ultraviolet-transparent quartz cover, measured during closure (see text). Blue circles, NOx concentrations measured inside a chamber containing a single shoot; green circles, NOx concentrations inside an empty chamber. Curves are solutions to the mass-balance equation used to determine NOx flux. Shoots were 1 yr old and 10–15 cm high. b, Representative experiment showing the change in NOx flux (red) and ultraviolet-A irradiance (black) in an ultraviolet-transparent plant chamber over 24 h on 28 June 2001. Green circles, NOx flux in the absence of the plant, which was removed at 12:40 and replaced at 14:50. c, Similar experiment, except that the transparent cover was replaced with an ultraviolet-opaque one (blue line) after 07:30 and the shoots were outside the chamber from 10:10 to 12:15.

NOx flux from the shoots occurred when they were exposed to solar ultraviolet light: when the shoots were removed from their ultraviolet-transparent chambers, the NOx flux decreased, but was restored when the shoots were replaced (Fig. 1b). We repeated this experiment using two chambers during three sunny days in summer 2001, and found that the measured reduction in NOx emission after removing the shoots, and the increase after inserting the shoots, were statistically significant on each occasion (P = 0.00004).

We confirmed that ultraviolet radiation was inducing NOx emission from the shoots by replacing the quartz covers on the chambers with ultraviolet-opaque methacrylate (plexiglass) covers (negligible transmittance at 290–320 nm). NOx emission decreased from shoots inside chambers with opaque covers, and removing the plants had no effect on NOx flux (Fig. 1c). Swapping the covers had no effect on photosynthesis, which uses visible light.

The uptake of NOx by plants increases as its atmospheric concentration increases, so a compensation point7 is frequently detected2,3,8,9. NOx concentrations at the SMEAR II station are usually below 1 part per billion (p.p.b), but in May 2001 they rose to 6 p.p.b. during an episode when the weather was cloudy and ultraviolet radiation was low (mostly <10 W m−2), causing NOx deposition. This varied linearly with the ambient concentration, and the compensation point was estimated to be around 1 p.p.b.

As ultraviolet radiation induces NOx emission from P. sylvestris shoots, it must also influence the compensation point. Assuming a linear relationship between exposure to ultraviolet light and NOx emission, and between the ambient concentration of NOx and its deposition, the compensation point is above 3 p.p.b. at maximum ultraviolet irradiance. In previous NOx-exchange studies3,8,9, ultraviolet radiation was excluded either by the chamber material or from the light source, causing the compensation-point estimates to be too low.

We do not yet know the origin of the emitted NOx. It may come from plant metabolism2 or be released from pine-needle surfaces as a result of ultraviolet irradiation, in a reaction similar to the one that occurs at the chamber walls. Gas-phase NOx is produced from snow by photolysis of nitrate10 — a reaction that would enable NOx emissions to recycle reactive nitrogen on foliage.

The NOx emission induced by ultraviolet radiation was 1 ng m−2 of pine-needle surface per second under conditions corresponding to a pre-industrial time, when the ambient NOx concentration was less than 0.5 p.p.b. A flux of this magnitude is sufficient to influence the availability of nitrogen to plants and may affect the atmospheric NOx budget11.


  1. 1

    Seinfeld, J. H. & Pandis, S. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change (Wiley, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Wildt, J., Kley, D., Rockel, A., Rockel, P. & Segschneider, H. J. J. Geophys. Res. 102 D, 5919–5927 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sparks, J. P., Monson, R. K., Sparks, K. L. & Lerdau, M. Oecologia 127, 214–221 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Vesala, T. et al. Trends Heat, Mass Momen. Transfer 4, 17–35 (1998).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Hari, P. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1297–1301 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Altimir, N., Vesala, T., Keronen, P., Kulmala, M. & Hari, P. Atmos. Environ. 36, 19–29 (2002).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Conrad, R. Biogeochemistry 27, 155–170 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Rondón, A. & Granat, L. Tellus B 46, 339–352 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hereid, D. P. & Monson, R. K. Atmos. Environ. 35, 975–983 (2001).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Honrath, R. E. et al. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 24183–24190 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Lerdau, M. T., Munger, W. & Jacob, D. J. Science 289, 2291–2293 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pertti Hari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hari, P., Raivonen, M., Vesala, T. et al. Ultraviolet light and leaf emission of NOx. Nature 422, 134 (2003).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.