Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner


The fastest gait and speed of the largest theropod (carnivorous) dinosaurs, such as Tyrannosaurus, is controversial. Some studies contend that Tyrannosaurus was limited to walking, or at best an 11 m s-1 top speed1,2,3,4, whereas others argue for at least 20 m s-1 running speeds5,6,7. We demonstrate a method of gauging running ability by estimating the minimum mass of extensor (supportive) muscle needed for fast running. The model's predictions are validated for living alligators and chickens. Applying the method to small dinosaurs corroborates other studies by showing that they could have been competent runners. However, models show that in order to run quickly, an adult Tyrannosaurus would have needed an unreasonably large mass of extensor muscle, even with generous assumptions. Therefore, it is doubtful that Tyrannosaurus and other huge dinosaurs (6,000 kg) were capable runners or could reach high speeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Explanation of free-body diagram analysis of body segments.
Figure 2: Limb orientation used for model Trex_1.
Figure 3: Estimated extensor muscle mass (T, as a percentage of body mass per leg) required to run quickly.


  1. Alexander, R. McN. Mechanics of posture and gait of some large dinosaurs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 83, 1–25 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, R. McN. Dynamics of Dinosaurs and Other Extinct Giants (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horner, J. R. & Lessem, D. The Complete T. rex (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farlow, J. O., Smith, M. B. & Robinson, J. M. Body mass, “strength indicator”, and cursorial potential of Tyrannosaurus rex. J. Vert. Paleont. 15, 713–725 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakker, R. T. Dinosaur Heresies (William Morrow, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul, G. S. Predatory Dinosaurs of the World (Simon & Schuster, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul, G. S. Limb design, function and running performance in ostrich-mimics and tyrannosaurs. Gaia 15, 257–270 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen, P. Strength indicator values of theropod long bones, with comments on limb proportions and cursorial potential. Gaia 15, 241–255 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farlow, J. O., Gatesy, S. M., Holtz, T. R. Jr, Hutchinson, J. R. & Robinson, J. M. Theropod locomotion. Am. Zool. 40, 640–663 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Irby, G. V. Paleoichnological evidence for running dinosaurs worldwide. Mus. N. Arizona Bull. 60, 109–112 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coombs, W. P. Jr . Sauropod habits and habitats. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 17, 1–33 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, T. J. Muscle force and stress during running in dogs and wild turkeys. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 156, 283–295 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biewener, A. A. Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. Science 245, 45–48 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, T. R., Chen, M. S. & Taylor, C. R. Energetics of bipedal running. II. Limb design and running mechanics. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2753–2762 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchinson, J. R. The Evolution of Hindlimb Anatomy and Function in Theropod Dinosaurs. PhD thesis, Univ. California (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carrano, M. T. & Hutchinson, J. R. The pelvic and hind limb musculature of Tyrannosaurus rex (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Morphol. (in the press).

  17. Alexander, R. McN., Jayes, A. S., Maloiy, G. M. O. & Wathuta, E. M. Allometry of the leg muscles of mammals. J. Zool. 194, 539–552 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett, M. B. Allometry of the leg muscles of birds. J. Zool. 238, 435–443 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grand, T. I. Body weight: its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution, and motor function. II. Interspecific comparisons. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 47, 211–240 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hallgrimsson, B. & Maiorana, V. Variability and size in mammals and birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70, 571–595 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gatesy, S. M. Guineafowl hind limb function. I: Cineradiographic analysis and speed effects. J. Morphol. 240, 115–125 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnston, I. A. Sustained force development: specializations and variation among the vertebrates. J. Exp. Biol. 115, 239–251 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blickhan, R. The spring-mass model for running and hopping. J. Biomech. 22, 1217–1227 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alexander, R. McN. The maximum forces exerted by animals. J. Exp. Biol. 115, 231–238 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cavagna, G. A., Heglund, N. C. & Taylor, C. R. Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. Am. J. Physiol. 233, 243–261 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander, R. McN. & Jayes, A. S. A dynamic similarity hypothesis for the gaits of quadrupedal mammals. J. Zool. 201, 135–152 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander, R. McN., Maloiy, G. M. O., Njau, R. & Jayes, A. S. Mechanics of running of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. Zool. 187, 169–178 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mendez, J. & Keys, A. Density and composition of mammalian muscle. Metabolism 9, 184–188 (1960).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank F. C. Anderson, K. Angielczyk, S. Delp, R. J. Full, S. M. Gatesy, T. M. Keaveny, R. Kram, K. Padian and J. F. Parham as well as the Berkeley Biomechanics and Stanford Neuromuscular Biomechanics seminars for input. J.R.H. appreciates funding from the University of California Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, and the National Science Foundation under a grant awarded in 2001. M.G. had postdoctorate funding through a DARPA grant to the Polypedal Lab at UC Berkeley. This is University of California Museum of Paleontology publication number 1749.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchinson, J., Garcia, M. Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner. Nature 415, 1018–1021 (2002).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing