Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Preliminary Report
  • Published:

The value of sildenafil as mode of stimulation in pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 13, pages 189–191 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to assess whether a single intracavernous injection (ICI) of a low dose of the combination of papaverine–phentolamine is replaceable by a high dose of the oral erectogenic agent sildenafil as mode of stimulation during pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography (PPDU). Eleven patients with complaints of erectile dysfunction were included in a crossover study. With an interval of two weeks the patients were exposed to ICI with papaverine/phentolamine (3.75 mg/0.125 mg) and oral administration with sildenafil (100 mg) preceding PPDU. Five patients started with ICI. Six patients started with sildenafil. In the sildenafil stimulation mode, visual erotic stimulation (VES) was used to initiate erection. VES was applied by personal LCD monitor. Cut-off values to define sufficient arterial response were: peak flow velocity (PSV) >25 cm/s and acceleration time (AT) <72 ms. Cut-off value to define sufficient veno-occlusion was a resistance index ≥1.00. Statistical analysis of PPDU parameters shows no significant difference between the two modes of stimulation for arterial response (PSV, AT), whereas the resistance index, as a parameter of veno-occlusive response was significantly higher in the sildenafil mode. This finding is confirmed in the clinical translation of the results: two patients with an insufficient arterial response to ICI had a sufficient arterial response to sildenafil and only one patient showed an insufficient arterial response following sildenafil, whereas the response following ICI was sufficient. Analysis of veno-occlusive responses shows remarkable differences between both modes of stimulation. Whereas following the administration of sildenafil all veno-occlusive responses were classified as sufficient, seven patients showed an insufficient veno-occlusive response following ICI. As mode of stimulation in PPDU, high dose sildenafil yields significantly less false positive diagnoses of ‘veno-occlusive dysfunction’ than intracavernous injection of the combination papaverine/phentolamine. No difference was found in the quality of the arterial response. Based on this study we conclude that sildenafil may replace ICI as mode of stimulation during PPDU.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lue TF, Mueller SC, Jow YR, Hwang TI . Functional evaluation of penile arteries with duplex ultrasound in vasodilator-induced erection. Urol Clin North Am 1989 16, 799–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lue TF, Hricak H, Marich KW, Tanagho EA . Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Radiology 1985 155, 777–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine SB et al. Side effects of self-administration of intracavernous papaverine and phentolamine for the treatment of impotence. J Urol 1989 141, 54–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heaton JPW, Adams MA, Morales A . A therapeutic taxonomy of treatments for erectile dysfunction. An evolutionary imperative. Int J Impot Res 1997 9, 115–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meuleman EJ et al. Penile pharmacological duplex ultrasonography: a dose–effect study comparing papaverine, papaverine/phentolamine and prostaglandin E1. J Urol 1992 148, 63–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arslan D et al. A noninvasive method in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: sildenafil+penile doppler ultrasonography. J Urol 2000 163, A1072, 241

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann K et al. Variable response to intracavernous prostaglandin E1 testing erectile dysfunction. Urology 1999 54, 539–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michiel Sedelaar who assisted in study design preparation and Herman van Lange for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    TGW Speel, I Bleumer, WL Diemont, MC van der Maas, H Wijkstra & EJ Meuleman

Authors
  1. TGW Speel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I Bleumer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. WL Diemont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. MC van der Maas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H Wijkstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. EJ Meuleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TGW Speel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speel, T., Bleumer, I., Diemont, W. et al. The value of sildenafil as mode of stimulation in pharmaco-penile duplex ultrasonography. Int J Impot Res 13, 189–191 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900704

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900704

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links