Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Repetition of color Doppler ultrasonography: is it necessary?

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine whether any difference would occur in peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) measurements of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) between proximal and distal segments of the cavernous arteries obtained at different times. Twenty-six cases have undergone CDU three times in weekly intervals. PSV and EDV measurements of cavernous arteries were obtained both proximally and distally.

The results have shown that statistically there was no difference between each measurement obtained on either sides at three different tests. (ANOVA PSV F(2–50)=0.63, EDV F(2–50)=0.81). Four of the 26 cases had different PSV results and six cases had different EDV results in three CDU tests. There was a statistical difference in measurements between proximal and distal segments of the cavernous arteries. (t-test t=2.53, P=0.015)

In conclusion, repetition of CDU would not be necessary in majority of the cases. However investigators should always be aware and cautious about falsely abnormal results of CDU. Proximal segments of the cavernous arteries should be the site to obtain true CDU measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akkuş, E., Alici, B., Özkara, H. et al. Repetition of color Doppler ultrasonography: is it necessary?. Int J Impot Res 10, 51–55 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900304

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900304

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links