Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Earthquake-like behaviour of soft γ-ray repeaters

Abstract

NEUTRON stars are believed to have solid crusts, which may exhibit tectonic activity analogous to earthquakes on Earth. These 'starquakes' have been invoked to explain several phenomena associated with neutron stars, such as the flashes of low-energy γ-rays from soft γ-ray repeaters1,2 (SGRs), and abrupt changes ('glitches') observed in the spin periods of some pulsars3,4. Here we show that SGR events and earthquakes share four distinctive statistical properties: power-law energy distributions, log-symmetric waiting time distributions, strong positive correlations between waiting times of successive events, and weak or no correlations between intensities and waiting times. These statistical similarities, together with the fact that the crustal energy liberated by starquakes is sufficient in principle to fuel the soft γ-ray flashes, suggest that SGRs are indeed powered by star-quakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson, C. & Duncan, R. C. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 275, 255–300 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Norris, J. P., Hertz, P., Wood, K. S. & Kouveliotou, C. Astrophys. J. 366, 240–252 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baym, G. & Pines, D. Ann. Phys. 66, 816–835 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Link, B. & Epstein, R. I. Astrophys. J. 457, 844–854 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandharipande, V. R., Pines, D. & Smith, R. A. Astrophys. J. 208, 550–566 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruderman, M. Astrophys. J. 382, 587–593 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laros, J. G. et al. Astrophys. J. 320, L111–L115 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Atteia, J.-L. et al. Astrophys. J. 320, L105–L110 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kouveliotou, C. et al. Astrophys. J. 322, L21–L25 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulkarni, S. R. & Frail, D. A. Nature 365, 33–35 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murakami, T. et al. Nature 368, 127–129 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kouveliotou, C. et al. Nature 368, 125–127 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fenimore, E. E., Laros, J. G. & Ulmer, A. Astrophys. J. 432, 742–752 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazets, E. P., Golenetskii, S. V., IIinskii, V. N., Aptekar, R. L. & Guryan, Yu. A. Nature 282, 587–589 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fenimore, E. E., Klebesadel, R. W. & Laros, J. G. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  16. Podsiadlowski, P., Rees, M. J. & Ruderman, M. A. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 273, 755–771 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Flowers, E. & Ruderman, M. A. Astrophys. J. 215, 302–310 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Duncan, R. C. & Thompson, C. Astrophys. J. 392, L9–L13 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 46, 105–145 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nishenko, S. P. & Buland, R. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 77, 1382–1399 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  21. McNalley, K. C. & Minster, J. B. J. geophys. Res. 86, 4955–4959 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepke, S. L., Carlson, J. M. & Shaw, B. E. J. geophys. Res. 99, 6769–6788 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurley, K. J., McBreen, B., Pabbette, M. & Steel, S. Astr. Astrophys. 288, L49–L52 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vidale, J. E., Ellsworth, W. L., Cole, A. & Marone, C. Nature 368, 624–626 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewin, W. H. G. et al. Astrophys. J. 319, 893–901 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gottwald, M., Haberd, F., Parmar, A. N. & White, N. E. Astrophys. J. 323, 575–581 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. van Paradijs, J. et al. Astr. Astrophys. 192, 147–152 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsuboi, C. Proc. Jap. Acad. 41, 392–397 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Preliminary Determination fo Epicenter Catalogs (US Geologic Survey, 1989–1994).

  30. Nava, S. J. & Smith, R. B. Earthquake Catalog for the Yeltowstone National Park Region, January 1,1991–December 31,1991 (Univ. Utah Seismograph Stations, Salt Lake City, 1993); http:// www.seis.utah.edu/Reports/YP1973–95Catalog.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nava, S. J. et al. Earthquake Catalog for the Utah Region, January 1, 1986–December 31, 1988 (Univ. Utah Seismograph Stations, Salt Lake City, 1993); http://www.seis.utah.edu/ Reports/UtahEqCatl962–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, B., Epstein, R., Guyer, R. et al. Earthquake-like behaviour of soft γ-ray repeaters. Nature 382, 518–520 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/382518a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/382518a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing