Abstract
LIMB development in Drosophila depends on subdivision of the limb primordia into functional units called compartments1–4. Cell interactions across compartment boundaries establish pattern-organizing centres that control growth and specify cell fates along the anteroposterior (AP) and dorsoventral (DV) axes of the limbs2,3,5–9. AP subdivision of the disc primordia is inherited from the embryonic ectoderm10. DV subdivision of the wing disc occurs during the second larval instar through localized expression of the apterous protein (Apterous) in dorsal cells2,11. A third major subdivision of the wing disc into wing and body-wall compartments also occurs in the second instar1. Here we show that specification of the wing primordium in early second instar depends on activity of the AP patterning system but not the DV system. These results define two distinct roles for the wingless gene: a primary role in specifying the wing primordium, and a subsequent role mediating the patterning activities of the DV compartment boundary9,12,13.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
García-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P. & Morata, G. Nature new Biol. 245, 251–253 (1973).
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. & Cohen, S. M. Cell 75, 741–752 (1993).
Basler, K. & Struhl, G. Nature 368, 208–214 (1994).
Blair, S. S. Bioessays 17, 299–309 (1995).
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J., Cohen, B. & Cohen, S. M. Nature 372, 175–179 (1994).
Williams, J. A., Paddock, S. W., Vorwerk, K. & Carroll, S. B. Nature 368, 299–305 (1994).
Tabata, T. & Kornberg, T. Cell 76, 89–102 (1994).
Zecca, M., Basler, K. & Struhl, G. Development 121, 2265–2278 (1995).
Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. & Cohen, S. M. Development 121, 4215–4225 (1995).
Cohen, S. M. Nature 343, 173–177 (1990).
Blair, S. S. Development 119, 339–351 (1993).
Phillips, R. & Whittle, J. R. S. Development 118, 427–438 (1993).
Couso, J. P., Bishop, S. & Martinez Arias, A. Development 120, 621–636 (1994).
Morata, G. & Lawrence, P. A. Devl Biol. 56, 227–240 (1977).
Couso, J. P., Bate, M. & Martinez Arias, A. Science 259, 484–489 (1993).
Williams, J. A., Paddock, S. W. & Carroll, S. B. Development 117, 571–584 (1993).
Cohen, B., Simcox, A. A. & Cohen, S. M. Development 117, 597–608 (1993).
Ng, M., Diaz-Benjumea, F. J. & Cohen, S. M. Development 121, 589–599 (1995).
Sharma, R. P. & Chopra, V. L. Devl Biol. 48, 461–465 (1976).
Speicher, S. A., Thomas, U., Hinz, U. & Knust, E. Development 120, 535–544 (1994).
Couso, J. P., Knust, E. & Martinez Arias, A. Curr. Biol. 5, 1437–1448 (1995).
Kim, J., Irvine, K. D. & Carroll, S. B. Cell 82, 795–802 (1995).
Wilder, E. L. & Perrimon, N. Development 121, 477–488 (1995).
Lawrence, P. A., Bodmer, R. & Vincent, J. P. Development 121, 4303–4308 (1995).
Williams, J. A., Bell, J. B. & Carrolll, S. B. Genes Dev. 5, 2481–2495 (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, M., Diaz-Benjumea, F., Vincent, JP. et al. Specification of the wing by localized expression of wingless protein. Nature 381, 316–318 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381316a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/381316a0
This article is cited by
-
A single WNT enhancer drives specification and regeneration of the Drosophila wing
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Wg secreted by conventional Golgi transport diffuses and forms Wg gradient whereas Wg tethered to extracellular vesicles do not diffuse
Cell Death & Differentiation (2021)
-
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of a wing-dimorphic stonefly reveals candidate wing loss genes
EvoDevo (2019)
-
JAK/STAT controls organ size and fate specification by regulating morphogen production and signalling
Nature Communications (2017)
-
Naa50/San-dependent N-terminal acetylation of Scc1 is potentially important for sister chromatid cohesion
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.