Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mean age of rifting and volcanism on Venus deduced from impact crater densities

Abstract

UNLIKE the extensively cratered highlands of the Moon and Mars, the surface of Venus does not preserve a record of heavy bombard-ment from the early history of the Solar System1-3. Those craters that are found on Venus appear to be statistically indistinguishable from a random spatial population and rarely show modification by folds, faults and lava flows1-3. Although the volcanic and tec-tonic history of Venus is still much debated2-5, there is mounting evidence for near-global resurfacing ~300-500 Myr ago1,2,6. Moreover, it has recently been noted that the density of impact craters on large volcanic structures is less than the average crater density of the planet, suggestive of significant activity after the resurfacing event7. It is not clear, however, whether these features represent late remnants of the global event or continuing volcanism and tectonism of a still active planet. To address this question, we have used the regional variations in crater density to date volcan-oes, rifts and coronae which, based on stratigraphic evidence, clearly post-date the main resurfacing event8-11. The calculated mean ages of 70-125 Myr exclude the possibility that the majority of these features represent the final stages of the global event.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schaber, G. G. et al. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13257–13301 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strom, R. G., Schaber, G. G. & Dawson, D. D. J. geophys. Res. 99, 10899–10926 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Phillips, R. J. et al. J. geophys. Res. 97, 15923–15948 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon, S. C. Physics Today 46, 48–55 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmentier, E. M. & Hess, P. C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 2015–2018 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bullock, M. A., Grinspoon, D. H. & Head, J. W. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2147–2150 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Namiki, N. & Solomon, S. C. Science 265, 929–933 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaber, G. G. Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 499–502 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Head, J. W., Crumpler, L. S., Aubele, J. C., Guest, J. E. & Saunders, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13153–13197 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Basilevsky, A. T. & Head, J. W. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 25, 65–66 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Basilevsky, A. T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 883–886 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malin, M. C., Grimm, R. E. & Herrick, R. R. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 24, 927–928 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrick, R. R. & Phillips, R. J. Icarus (in the press).

  14. Arvidson, R. E. et al. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13303–13318 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Young, H. D. Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data Vol. 1 57–64 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turcotte, D. L. J. geophys. Res. 98, 17061–17068 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Solomon, S. C. et al. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13199–13256 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Senske, D. A., Schaber, G. G. & Stofan, E. R. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13395–13420 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shoemaker, E. M., Wolfe, R. F. & Shoemaker, C. S. in Reports of Planetary Geology and Geophysics Program–1990 389–390 (Tech. Memo. TM-4300, NASA, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ivanov, M. A. & Basilevsky, A. T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 2579–2582 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stofan, E. R. et al. J. geophys. Res. 97, 13347–13378 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Price, M., Suppe, J. Mean age of rifting and volcanism on Venus deduced from impact crater densities. Nature 372, 756–759 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/372756a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/372756a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing