Letter | Published:

Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision

Naturevolume 369pages313315 (1994) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

IN vision, attentional limitations are reflected in interference or reduced accuracy when two objects must be identified at once in a brief display1,2. In our experiments a brief temporal separation was introduced between the two objects to be identified. We measured how long the first object continued to interfere with the second, and hence the time course of the first object's attentional demand. According to conventional serial models, attention is assigned rapidly to one object after another, with a dwell time of only a few dozen milliseconds per item3,4. But we report here that interference lasts for several hundred milliseconds—an order of magnitude more than the prediction of conventional models. We suggest that visual attention is not a high-speed switching mecha-nism, but a sustained state during which relevant objects become available to influence behaviour. This conclusion is consistent with recent physiological results in the monkey5.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Treisman, A. M. Psychol. Rev. 76, 282–299 (1969).

  2. 2

    Duncan, J. Psychol. Rev. 87, 272–300 (1980).

  3. 3

    Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. Cognitive Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980).

  4. 4

    Bergen, J. R. & Julesz, B. Nature 303, 696–698 (1983).

  5. 5

    Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J. & Desimone, R. Nature 363, 345–347 (1993).

  6. 6

    Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. Psychol. Rev. 84, 1–66 (1977).

  7. 7

    Sperling, G., Budiansky, J., Spivak, J. G. & Johnson, M. C. Science 174, 307–311 (1971).

  8. 8

    Townsend, J. T. Percept. Psychophys. 10, 161–163 (1971).

  9. 9

    Pashler, H. & Badgio, P. C. in Attention and Performance XII (ed. Coltheart, M.) 63–81 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1987).

  10. 10

    Bundesen, C. Psychol. Rev. 97, 523–547 (1990).

  11. 11

    Weichselgartner, E. & Sperling, G. Science 238, 778–780 (1987).

  12. 12

    Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. & Rafal, R. D. J. Neurosci. 4, 1863–1874 (1984).

  13. 13

    Fagot, C. & Pashler, H. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 1058–1079 (1992).

  14. 14

    Broadbent, D. E. & Broadbent, M. H. P. Percept. Psychophys. 42, 105–113 (1987).

  15. 15

    Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. & Arnell, K. M. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 849–860 (1992).

  16. 16

    Posner, M. I. Chronometric Explorations of Mind (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1978).

  17. 17

    Moran, J. & Desimone, R. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).

  18. 18

    Yantis, S. & Johnson, D. N. J. exp. Psychol., hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 812–825 (1990).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 2EF, UK

    • John Duncan
    •  & Robert Ward
  2. Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada

    • Kimron Shapiro

Authors

  1. Search for John Duncan in:

  2. Search for Robert Ward in:

  3. Search for Kimron Shapiro in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/369313a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.