Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radar interferometric mapping of deformation in the year after the Landers earthquake

Abstract

ALTHOUGH the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake sequence occurred in an area well sampled by geodetic networks1–3, the postseismic deformation in the months following the earthquake has been measured at only 15 geodetic stations4. Another shortcoming in the geodetic coverage occurs west of the primary rupture, where the existing geodetic observations suggest, but cannot resolve, sympathetic slip on secondary faults1. Such measurements, which are needed to place the Landers earthquake sequence in the context of a recurring seismic cycle in California, can be obtained with the dense spatial coverage provided by satellite radar interferometry5–9. Here we present radar maps of the surface deformation field which reveal features that would otherwise have been poorly sampled, particularly if the earthquake had occurred in a less accessible area. We see triggered slip at the level of several centimetres as far as 100 km from the primary rupture, and can resolve the geodetic signal of at least one small (magnitude ˜5) aftershock. The amount of surface slip following the main shock is less than a decimetre, and is consistent with an exponential decay time of several months for the postseismic deformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray, M. H., Savage, J. C., Lisowski, M. & Gross, W. K. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 623–626 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blewitt, G. et al. Nature 361, 340–342 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bock, Y. et al. Nature 361, 337–340 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen, Z., Jackson, D., Feng, Y., Kim, M. & Cline, M. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. (in the press).

  5. Massonnet, D. Etude de Principe d'une Détection de Mouvements Tectoniques par Radar (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabriel, A. K., Goldstein, R. M. & Zebker, H. A. J. geophys. Res. 94, 9183–9191 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Massonnet, D et al. Nature 364, 138–142 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldstein, R. M., Engelhardt, H., Kamb, B. & Frolich, R. M. Science 262, 1525–1530 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zebker, H. A., Rosen, P., Goldstein, R. M., Gabriel, A. & Werner, C. L. J. geophys. Res. (submitted).

  10. Sieh, K. et al. Science 260, 171–176 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohee, B. P. & Beroza, G. C. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. (in the press).

  12. Freymueller, J., King, N. E. & Segall, P. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. (in the press).

  13. Hudnut, K. W. et al. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. (in the press).

  14. Wald, D. J. & Heaton, T. H. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. (in the press).

  15. Hauksson, E., Jones, L. M., Hutton, K. & Eberhart-Phillips, D. J. geophys. Res. 98, 19835–19858 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peltzer, G., Feigl, K. L. & Massonnet, D. EOS (suppl., Oct. 26) 74, 60 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. US Geological Survey Digital Elevations Models: Data Users Guide Vol. 5 1–34 (US Govt Print. Off., Washington DC, 1993).

  18. Massonnet, D. & Rabaute, T. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 31, 455–464 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. US Geological Survey Staff EOS (suppl. Oct. 27) 73, 357–358 (1992).

  20. Padgett, D. & Rockwell, T. EOS (suppl. Oct. 26) 74, 68 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harris, R. A. & Simpson, R. W. Nature 360, 251–254 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaumé, S. C. & Sykes, L. R. Science 258, 1325–1328 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stein, R. S., King, G. C. P. & Lin, J. Science 258, 1328–1332 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Okada, Y. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1135–1154 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Feigl, K. L. et al. J. geophys. Res. 98, 21677–21712 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. California Division Mines and Geology. Preliminary Fault Activity Map of California (Calif. Dept. of Conservation, Sacramento, 1992).

  27. Zebker, H. A. & Villasenor, J. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 30, 950–959 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massonnet, D., Feigl, K., Rossi, M. et al. Radar interferometric mapping of deformation in the year after the Landers earthquake. Nature 369, 227–230 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/369227a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/369227a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing