Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids

Nature volume 368, pages 629–632 (1994)Cite this article

Abstract

THE existence of sympatric speciation—that populations diverge into species in the absence of physical or ecological barriers—is controversial1–6. The East African Great Lakes harbour hundreds of cichlid species representing only a few monophyletic lineages7,8, although palaeolimnological evidence9–11 and local restrictions on species distribution12 suggest that speciation in these lakes could have been allopatric13,14. The case for sympatry in restricted areas of Lakes Malawi and Tanganyika is stronger15–17 but not unassailable. A better case might be made for cichlid species flocks in small, ecologically monotonous crater lakes. Here we present a mitochondrial DNA analysis of cichlid species flocks endemic to two such lakes in Cameroon. The results suggest that the flocks in each lake are monophyletic: the implication being that each lake was colonized once only, the size and shape of each lake being such that subsequent diversification would have been sympatric.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Futuyma, D. J. & Mayer, G. C. Sysl. Zool. 29, 254–271 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. in Speciation and its Consequences (eds Otte, D. & Endler, J. A.) 433–457 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felsenstein, J. Evolution 35, 124–138 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coyne, J. A. Nature 355, 511–515 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Otte, D, & Endler, J. A. (eds) Speciation and its Consequences (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, (1989).

  6. Kondrashow, A. S. & Mina, V. M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27, 201–223 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, A., Kocher, T. D., Basasibwaki, P. & Wilson, A. C. Nature 347, 550–553 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nishida, M. Experientia 47, 974–979 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Livingstone, D. A. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 249–280 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen, R. B. et al. Proc. R. Soc. B 240, 519–553 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiercelin, J.-J. & Mondeguer, A. in Lake Tanganyika and its Life (ed. Coulter, G. W.) 7–48 (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ribbink, A. J., March, B. A., Marsh, A. C., Ribbink, B. J. & Sharp, B. J. S. Afr. J. Zool. 18, 1–180 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rice, W. R. & Salt, G. W. Evolution 44, 1140–1152 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayr, E. in Evolution of Fish Species Flocks (eds Echelle, A. A. & Kornfield, I.) 3–11 (Univ. of Maine Press, Orono, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. McKaye, K. R., Kocher, T., Reinthal, P. & Kornfield, I. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 76, 91–96 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McKaye, K. R., Kocher, T., Reinthal, P., Harrison, R. & Kornfield, I. Evolution 38, 215–219 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sturmbauer, C. & Meyer, A. Nature 358, 578–581 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Trewavas, E., Green, J. & Corbet, S. A. J. Zool., Lond. 167, 41–95 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stiassny, M., Schliewen, U. K. & Dominey, W. Ichthyol. exp. Freshwaters 3, 311–346 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dominey, W. & Snyder, A. M. Env. Biol. Fish. 22, 155–160 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenwood, P. H. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 53, 139–203 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thys van den Audenaerde, D. F. Rev. Zool. Bot, Afr. 82, 285–300 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kling, G. W. thesis, Duke Univ., Princeton (1987).

  24. Maynard Smith, J. Am. Nat. 100, 637–650 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pimm, W. L. J. Linn. Soc. 11, 131–139 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seger, J. in Evolution, Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith (eds Greenwood, P. J., Harvey, P. H. & Slatkin, M.) 43–53 (Cambridge Univ. Press, UK, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Udovic, D. Am. Nat. 116, 621–641 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rice, W. R. Evol. Ecol. 1, 301–314 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKaye, K. R. Env. Biol. Fish. 5, 75–78 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer, A. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39, 279–299 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kling, G. W. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33, 27–40 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hassert, K. Z. Ges. Erdk. Berl. 1912, 7–41, 135–144, 203–216 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trewavas, E. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 26, 331–419 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teugels, G., Reid, G. & King, R. K. Ann. Mus. Roy. Afr. Centr., Sci. Zool. 266, 1–132 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pääbo, S., Gifford, J. A. & Wilson, A. C. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 9775–9787 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas, R. H., Schaffner, W., Wilson, A. C. & Pääbo, S. Nature 340, 465–467 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kocher, T. D. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6196–6200 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bachmann, B., Lücke, W. & Hunsmann, G. Nucl. Acids Res. 5, 1309 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Felsenstein, J. P. Version 3.3 (Univ. Washington, Seattle, 1990).

  40. Felsenstein, J. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Zoologie, Postfach 202136, D-80021, München, Germany

    Ulrich K. Schliewen, Diethard Tautz & Svante Pääbo

  2. Max-Planck-lnstitut für Verhaltensphysiologie, D-82319, Seewiesen, Germany

    Ulrich K. Schliewen

Authors
  1. Ulrich K. Schliewen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diethard Tautz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Svante Pääbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schliewen, U., Tautz, D. & Pääbo, S. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature 368, 629–632 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/368629a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/368629a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing