Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos

Abstract

THE four-year cycle of microtine rodents in boreal and arctic regions was first described in 1924 (ref. 1). Competing hypotheses on the mechanisms underlying the small mammal cycle have been extensively tested2–5, but so far the sustained rodent oscillations are unexplained. Here we use two mutually supportive approaches to investigate this question. First, building on studies of the interaction between rodents and their mustelid predators6–9, we construct a predator–prey model with seasonality. Second, we use a new technique of nonlinear analysis10,11 to examine empirical time-series data, and compare them with the model dynamics. The model parameterized with field data predicts dynamics that closely resemble the observed dynamics of boreal rodent populations. Both the predicted and observed dynamics are chaotic, albeit with a statistically significant periodic component. Our results suggest that the multiannual oscillations of rodent populations in Fennoscandia are due to delayed density dependence imposed by mustelid predators, and are chaotic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elton, C. Voles, Mice and Lemmings: Problems in Population Dynamics (Oxford Univ. Press, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krebs, C. J. & Myers, J. H. Adv. ecol. Res. 8, 267–399 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Christian, C. J. in Populations of Small Mammals under Natural Conditions (ed. Snyder, D. P.) 143–158 (Pymatuning Lab. Ecol. Spec. Publ. 5, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson, L. & Henttonen, H. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 195–200 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Batzli, G. O. in Wildlife 2001: Populations (eds McCullough, D. M. & Barrett, R. H.) 831–850 (Elsevier, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Henttonen, H., Oksanen, T., Jortikka, A. & Haukisalmi, V. Oikos 50, 353–365 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanski, I., Hansson, L. & Henttonen, H. J. Anim. Ecol. 60, 353–367 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Korpimäki, E., Norrdahl, K. & Rinta-Jaskari, T. Oecologia 88, 552–561 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oksanen, L. & Oksanen, T. Ecography 15, 226–236 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turchin, P. Oikos (in the press).

  11. Turchin, P. & Millstein, J. A. EcoDyn/RSM: Response Surface Modelling of Nonlinear Ecological Dynamics (Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, NY, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. May, R. M. Complexity and Stability of Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson, L. & Henttonen, H. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 22, 277–288 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erlinge, S. Oikos 25, 308–314 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tapper, S. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 603–617 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Henttonen, H. Oikos 50, 366–370 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Korpimäki, E. & Norrdahl, K. Oikos, 55, 205–215 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanski, I. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6, 141–142 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Erlinge, S. Oikos 26, 378–384 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tapper, S. C. J. Zool. 179, 219–224 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hansson, L. in Winter Ecology of Small Mammals (ed. Merritt J. F.) 225–234 (Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. No. 10, Pittsburgh, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaikusalo, A. & Tast, J. in Winter Ecology of Small Mammals (ed. Merritt, J. F.) 243–252 (Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. No. 10, Pittsburgh, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  23. May, R. M. Science 186, 645–647 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. May, R. M. Nature 261, 459–467 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolff, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. Physica 16D, 285–317 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Korpimäki, E. & Norrdahl, K. Oikos 62, 195–208 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillingham, B. J. J. Mammal. 65, 517–519 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Erlinge, S. et al. Oikos 40, 36–52 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jedrzejewska, B. & Jedrzejewski, W. Acta Theriol. 34, 347–359 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Laine, K. & Henttonen, H. Oikos 40, 407–418 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laine, K. & Henttonen, H. Oikos, 50, 389–395 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanski, I., Turchin, P., Korpimäki, E. et al. Population oscillations of boreal rodents: regulation by mustelid predators leads to chaos. Nature 364, 232–235 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/364232a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/364232a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing