Abstract
THE mole rat, Spalax ehrenberghi, is an extreme example of natural visual degeneration in mammals: visual pathways are regressed and incomplete1, and the absence of visual cortical potentials or an overt behavioural response to light have led to the conclusion that Spalax is completely blind2–4. But structural and molecular investigations of the atrophied, subcutaneous eye suggest a functional role for the retina in light perception5,6, and entrainment of circadian locomotor and thermoregulatory rhythms by ambient light demonstrates a capacity for photoperiodic detection2,7–9. We report here that severe regression of thalamic and tectal structures involved in form and motion perception is coupled to a selective hypertrophy of structures subserving photoperiodic functions. As an alternative to the prevalent view that ocular regression results from negative or nonselective evolutionary processes10–12, the differential reduction and expansion of visual structures in Spalax can be explained as an adaptive response to the underground environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bronchti, G., Rado, R., Terkel, J. & Wollberg, Z. Devl Brain Res. 58, 159–170 (1991).
Halm, A., Heth, G., Pratt, H. & Nevo, E. J. exp. Biol. 107, 59–64 (1983).
Heil, P., Bronchti, G., Wollberg, Z. & Scheich, H. Neuroreport 2, 735–738 (1991).
Necker, R., Rehkämper, G. & Nevo, E. Neuroreport 3, 505–508 (1992).
Sanyal, S., Jansen, H. G., De Grip, W. J., Nevo, E. & De Yong, W. W. Invest. Ophthalmol. vis. Sci. 31, 1398–1404 (1990).
de Jong, W. W., Hendriks, W., Sanyal, S. & Nevo, E. in Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels (eds Nevo, E. & Reig, O. A.) 383–395 (Liss, New York, 1990).
Pevet, P., Heth, G., Haim, A. & Nevo, E. J. exp. Zool. 232, 41–50 (1984).
Heth, G., Pevet, P., Nevo, E. & Beiles, A. J. exp. Biol. 238, 1–9 (1986).
Rado, R., Gev, H. & Terkel, J. Israel J. Zool. 35, 105–106 (1988).
Wright, S., Am. Nat. 98, 65–69 (1964).
Brace, C. L. Am. Nat. 97, 39–49 (1963).
Wilkens, H. Evolution 25, 530–544 (1971).
Cei, G. Monitore zool. ital. 55, 69–88 (1946).
Collin, J-P. & Oksche, A. in The Pineal Gland (ed. Reiter, R. J.) 27–67 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1981).
Cooper, H. M., Herbin, M. & Nevo, E. J. comp. Neurol. (in the press).
Cassone, V. M., Speh, J. C., Card, J. P. & Moore, R. Y. J. biol. Rhythms 3, 71–91 (1988).
Magnin, M., Cooper, H. M. & Mick, G. Brain Res. 488, 390–397 (1989).
Balkema, G. W. & Dräger, U. C. Vis. Neurosci. 4, 593–604 (1990).
Pickard, G. E. J. comp. Neurol. 211, 65–83 (1982).
Kudo, M., Nakamura, Y., Morizumi, T., Tokumo, H. & Kitao, Y. Neurosci. Lett. 93, 176–180 (1988).
Lund, R. D. & Lund, J. S. Expl Neurol. 13, 302–316 (1965).
Levine, J. D., Weiss, M. L., Rosenwasser, A. M. & Miselis, R. R. J. comp. Neurol. 306, 344–360 (1991).
Meijer, J. H. & Reitveld, W. J. Physiol. Rev. 69, 671–707 (1989).
Nelson, D. E. & Takahashi, J. S. J. Physiol. 439, 115–145 (1991).
Nevo, E. in Evolutionary Biology Vol. 25 (eds Hecht, M. K., Wallace, B. & MacIntyre, R. J.) 1–125 (Plenum, New York, 1991).
Beltramino, C. & Taleisnik, S. Neuroendocrinology 30, 238–242 (1980).
Cooper, K. E., Kasting, N. W., Lederis, K. & Veale, W. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 295, 33–45 (1979).
Kasting, N. M. & Martin, J. D. Brain Res. 258, 127–132 (1983).
Pévet, P., Buijs, R. M., Masson-Pévet, M. & Canguilhem, B. in Fundamentals and Clinics in Pineal Research (eds Trentini, G. P., de Gaetani, C. & Pévet, P.) 221–235 (Raven, New York, 1987).
Weaver, D. R., Rivkees, S. A., & Reppert, S. M. J. Neurosci. 9, 2581–2590 (1989).
Cooper, H. M., Mick, G. & Magnin, M. Brain Res. 477, 350–357 (1989).
Cooper, A. M. & Cowey, A. Neuroscience 35, 335–344 (1990).
Toga, A. W. & Collins, R. C. J. comp. Neurol. 199, 443–464 (1981).
Sugita, S. & Otani, K. Expl. Neurol. 82, 413–423 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, H., Herbin, M. & Nevo, E. Ocular regression conceals adaptive progression of the visual system in a blind subterranean mammal. Nature 361, 156–159 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361156a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361156a0
This article is cited by
-
Biogeomorphological eco-evolutionary feedback between life and geomorphology: a theoretical framework using fossorial mammals
The Science of Nature (2021)
-
Light modulates oscillatory alpha activity in the occipital cortex of totally visually blind individuals with intact non-image-forming photoreception
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Selective binocular vision loss in two subterranean caviomorph rodents: Spalacopus cyanus and Ctenomys talarum
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Genome-wide adaptive complexes to underground stresses in blind mole rats Spalax
Nature Communications (2014)
-
Transcriptome analysis of the spalax hypoxia survival response includes suppression of apoptosis and tight control of angiogenesis
BMC Genomics (2012)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.