Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Rational disposal of chemical weapons

Nature volume 360, pages 621–622 (1992)Cite this article

The world's chemical weapons are due to be destroyed within 10 years. How sensible is a radical proposal to destroy Russia's stockpiles by means of underground nuclear explosions?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. US Department of the Army Chemical Agent and Munition Disposal: Summary of the U.S. Army Experience (Office of the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Maryland, 1987).

  2. Black, S., Morel, B. & Zapf, P. Nature 351, 515–516 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andryushin, I. A., Trutnov, Yu. A. & Chernyshev, A. K. Report on some Aspects of Creation of Nuclear Explosion Technology for Destruction of Toxic and Hazardous Materials and Waste Products (Arzamas 16, 1992).

  4. US Office of Technology Assessment The Containment of Underground Nuclear Explosions (Washington, DC, 1988).

  5. Johnson, G. W., Higgins, G. H. & Violet, C. E. J. geophys. Res. 64, 1457 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duff, R. The Feasibility of Chemical Munitions Disposal using Nuclear Explosions DNA-TR-81-205 (Defense Nuclear Agency, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mason, E. A. & Malinauskas, A. P. Gas Transport in Porous Media: The Dusty Gas Model (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burkhard, N. R., Hearst, J. R., Peterson, E. W., Nilson, R. H. & Lie, K. H. Containment of Cavity Gas in Fractured or Rubblized Emplacement Media UCRL-100953. DE90001054 (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1989).

  9. Kunkle, T. D. & Travis, B. J. Hydrofracture From a Growing Cavity LA-UR-82-2308 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patterson, D. W. J. geophys. Res. 71, 3427 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glenn, L. A. Energy Density Effects on Seismic Decoupling UCRL-JC-109393 (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, 4G23 Forbes Quad-rangle, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260

    Stephen Black

  2. Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennslyvania, 15213-3890, USA

    Benoit Morel

Authors
  1. Stephen Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benoit Morel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Black, S., Morel, B. Rational disposal of chemical weapons . Nature 360, 621–622 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360621a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/360621a0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing