Abstract
THE increasingly rapid pace at which genomic DNA sequences are being determined has created a need for more efficient techniques to determine which parts of these sequences are bound in vivo by the proteins controlling processes such as gene expression, DNA replication and chromosomal mechanics. Here we describe a whole-genome approach to identify and characterize such DNA sequences. The method uses endogenous or artificially introduced methylases to methylate all genomic targets except those protected in vivo by protein or non-protein factors interfering with methylase action. These protected targets remain unmethylated in purified genomic DNA and are identified using methylation-sensitive restriction endonucleases. When the method was applied to the Escherichia coli genome, 0.1% of the endogenous adenine methyltransferase (Dam methylase) targets were found to be unmethylated. Five foreign methylases were examined by transfection. Database-matched DNA sequences flanking the in vivo -protected Dam sites all fell in the non-coding regions of seven E. coli operons (mtl, cdd, flh, gut, car, psp and fep). In the first four operons these DNA sequences closely matched the consensus sequence that binds to the cyclic AMP-receptor protein. The in vivo protection at the Dam site upstream of the car operon was correlated with a downregulation of car expression, as expected of a feedback represser-binding model.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Razin, A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 1783–1792 (1980).
Geier, G. & Modrich, P. J. biol. Chem. 254, 1408–1413 (1979).
Blyn, L. B., Braaten, B. A. & Low, D. A. EMBO J. 9, 4045–4054 (1990).
Ringquist, S. & Smith, C. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 4539–4543 (1992).
Braaten, B. A. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 4250–4254 (1992).
Campbell, J. L. & Kleckner, N. Gene 74, 189–190 (1988).
Jaworski, A. et al. Science 238, 773–777 (1987).
Yang, C. C. & Nash, H. Cell 57, 869–880 (1989).
Schultz, S. C., Shields, G. C. & Steitz, T. A. Science 253, 1001–1007 (1991).
Wilson, G. G. Gene 74, 281–289 (1988).
Valentin-Hansen, P. et al. Molec. Microbiol. 3, 1385–1390 (1989).
Bird, A. P. & Southern, E. M. J. molec. Biol. 118, 27–47 (1978).
Yamada, M. & Saier, M. J. biol. Chem. 262, 5455–5462 (1987).
Lengeler, J. & Steinberger, H. Molec. gen. Genet. 164, 163–170 (1978).
Sabounn, D. & Beckwith, J. J. Bact. 122, 338–340 (1975).
Piette, J. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 4134–4138 (1984).
Lyons, S. M. & Schendel, P. F. J. Bact. 159, 421–423 (1984).
Campbell, J. L. & Kleckner, N. Cell 62, 967–979 (1990).
Ephrussi, A., Church, G. M., Tonegawa, S. & Gilbert, W. Science 227, 134–140 (1985).
Becker, M. M. & Wang, J. C. Nature 309, 682–687 (1984).
Cartwright, I. & Kelly, S. E. Bio Techniques 11, 188–203 (1991).
Saluz, H. P., Wiebauer, K. & Wallace, A. Trends Genet. 7, 207–211 (1991).
Singh, J. & Klar, A. J. S. Genes Dev. 6, 186–196 (1992).
Feher, Z., Schlagman, S. L. Miner, Z. & Hattman, S. Curr. Genet. 16, 461–464 (1989).
Kwoh, T. J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 11489–11505 (1988).
Vovis, G. F. & Lacks, S. J. J. molec. Biol 115, 525–538 (1977).
Gribskov, M., Luthy, R., & Eisenberg, D. Meth. Enzym. 183, 146–159 (1990).
Stormo, G. D. & Hartzell, G. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1183–1187 (1989).
Jiang, W. et al. Molec. Microbiol. 4, 2003–2006 (1990).
Davis, T., Yamada, M., Elgort, M. & Saier, M. H. Molec. Microbiol. 2, 405–412 (1988).
Silverman, M. & Simon, M. J. Bact. 120, 1196–1203 (1974).
Bartlett, B. H., Frantz, B. B. & Matsumura, P. J. Bact. 170, 1575–1581 (1988).
Brissette, J. L., Weiner, L., Ripmaster, T. L. & Model, P. Genbank 69.0 (1991).
Shea, C. M. & Mclntosh, M. A. Genbank 69.0 (1991).
E'oright, R. in Molecular Structure and Biological Activity (eds Griffen, J. & Duax, W.) (Elsevier Scientific, New York, 1982).
Gunasekera, A., Ebright, Y. W. & Ebright, R. H. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6853–6856 (1990).
Church, G. M. & Gilbert, W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 1991–1995 (1984).
Church, G. M. & Kieffer-Higgins, S. Science 240, 185–188 (1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Church, G. A whole genome approach to in vivo DNA-protein interactions in E. coli. Nature 360, 606–610 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360606a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/360606a0
This article is cited by
-
The bacterial epigenome
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2020)
-
A role for the bacterial GATC methylome in antibiotic stress survival
Nature Genetics (2016)
-
Single molecule-level detection and long read-based phasing of epigenetic variations in bacterial methylomes
Nature Communications (2015)
-
Phylogeographic evidence of cognate recognition site patterns and transformation efficiency differences in H. pylori: theory of strain dominance
BMC Microbiology (2013)
-
Evolutionary Analysis of the Two-Component Systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
Journal of Molecular Evolution (2004)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.