Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Crustal control of ridge segmentation inferred from observations of the Reykjanes Ridge

Abstract

LARGE-AMPLITUDE variations in topography and inferred crustal thickness along the axes of mid-ocean ridges, often referred to as segmentation1, are mainly observed at slow-spreading ridges2–4. This observation has led to the suggestion that mantle processes give rise to segmentation only when spreading rates are low5,6. Here we make the alternative proposal that the development of segmentation is controlled by the temperature of the crust: segmentation cannot develop when the lower crust is hot enough to undergo rapid ductile flow. Thermal models predict that thick crust at a slow-spreading ridge may be as hot as normal-thickness crust along fast-spreading ridges; we accordingly test our hypothesis at a slow-spreading ridge characterized by thick crust—the Reykjanes Ridge. Topography and gravity data along the Reykjanes Ridge axis indeed show an absence of segmentation, suggesting that the thermal state of the crust, rather than any mantle process, controls the development of this structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin, J., Purdy, G. M., Schouten, H., Sempere, J. C. & Zervas, C. Nature 344, 627–632 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Madsen, J. A., Detrick, R. S., Mutter, J. C., Buhl, R. & Orcutt, J. A. J. geophys. Res. 95, 4967–4987 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris, E. & Detrick, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 96, 4355–4366 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blackman, D. K. & Forsyth, D. W. J. geophys. Rev. 96, 11741–11758 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmentier, E. M. & Phipps-Morgan, J. Nature 348, 325–328 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, J. & Phipps-Morgan, J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 13–16 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Talwani, M., Windisch, C. C. & Langseth, M. G. J. geophys. Res. 76, 473–517 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woodside, J. M. Can. J. Earth Sci. 9, 942–959 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo, B. & Forsyth, D. W. Mar. geophys. Res. 10, 205–232 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sempéré, J.-C., Purdy, G. M. & Schouten, H. Nature 344, 427–431 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogt, Peter R. in The Geology of North America, Vol. M (eds Vogt, P. & Tucholke, B.) 189–204 (Geological Society of America, Boulder, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bunch, A. & Kennett, B. L. N. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 61, 141–166 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. RRISP J. Geophys. 47, 228–238 (1980).

  14. Purdy, G. M. and Ewing, J. in The Geology of North America, Vol. M (eds Vogt, P. & Tucholke, B.) 313–330 (Geological Society of America, Boulder, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schilling, J. G. The Geology of North America, Vol. M (eds Vogt, P. & Tucholke, B.) 137–156 (Geological Society of America, Boulder, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, Y. & Morgan, W. J. J. geophys. Res. 95, 9275–9282 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turcotte, D. L. & Schubert, G. Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems (Wiley, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bird, P. J. geophys. Res. 96, 10275–10286 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald, K. C., Scheirer, D. S. & Carbotte, S. M. Science 253, 986–994 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson, D. S., Clague, D. A., Sleep, N. H. & Morton, J. L. J. geophys. Res. 93, 11974–11984 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, R., Buck, W. Crustal control of ridge segmentation inferred from observations of the Reykjanes Ridge. Nature 357, 583–586 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/357583a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/357583a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing