Letter | Published:

Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations

Nature volume 355, pages 250253 (16 January 1992) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

THE 'iterated prisoner's dilemma' is now the orthodox paradigm for the evolution of cooperation among selfish individuals. This viewpoint is strongly supported by Axelrod's computer tournaments, where 'tit for tat' (TFT) finished first1. This has stimulated interest in the role of reciprocity in biological societies1–8. Most theoretical investigations, however, assumed homogeneous populations (the setting for evolutionary stable strategies9,10) and programs immune to errors. Here we try to come closer to the biological situation by following a program6 that takes stochasticities into account and investigates representative samples. We find that a small fraction of TFT players is essential for the emergence of reciprocation in a heterogeneous population, but only paves the way for a more generous strategy. TFT is the pivot, rather than the aim, of an evolution towards cooperation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, 1984).

  2. 2.

    & Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981).

  3. 3.

    Social Evolution (Cummings, Menlo Park, 1985).

  4. 4.

    & Science 242, 1385–1390 (1988).

  5. 5.

    & Nature 327, 58–59 (1987).

  6. 6.

    Nature 327, 15–17 (1987).

  7. 7.

    Nature 325, 434–435 (1987).

  8. 8.

    Nature 308, 181–184 (1984).

  9. 9.

    Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, UK, 1982).

  10. 10.

    & The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems (Cambridge University Press, UK, 1988).

  11. 11.

    in Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing (ed. Davis, D.) (Pitman, London, 1987).

  12. 12.

    Internat. J. Game Th. 4, 25–55 (1975).

  13. 13.

    J. theor. Biol. 136, 47–56 (1989).

  14. 14.

    & J. theor. Biol. 137, 21–26 (1989).

  15. 15.

    & Acta appl. Math. 20, 247–265 (1990).

  16. 16.

    Theor. Pop. Biol. 38, 93–112 (1990).

  17. 17.

    J. Conflict Resolut. 29, 611–618 (1985).

  18. 18.

    in Artificial Life II (eds Farmer, D. et al.) (Proc. Santa Fe Inst. Stud., Addison-Welsey 1991).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3PS, UK

    • Martin A. Nowak
  2. Institut für Mathematik, Universität Wien, Strudlhofg. 4, A-1090 Wien, Austria

    • Karl Sigmund

Authors

  1. Search for Martin A. Nowak in:

  2. Search for Karl Sigmund in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/355250a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.