Letter | Published:

Basal body movements as a mechanism for mitochondrial genome segregation in the trypanosome cell cycle

Naturevolume 352pages731733 (1991) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

THE mitochondrial genome of Trypanosoma brucei is organized in the form of a complex catenated network of circular DNA molecules. This mass of DNA, known as the kinetoplast, is present at a unique site in the single mitochondrion, and is replicated in a discrete, periodic S phase of the cell cycle. The single-copy nature of the kinetoplast suggests that there is a mechanism ensuring segregation fidelity of replicated copies to each daughter cell. Historically, speculation regarding the nature of this mechanism has often attributed significance to the close association between the kinetoplast and the flagellum basal body. We provide here direct evidence that this mitochondrial DNA complex is indeed linked to the basal body, and segregation of the kinetoplast DNA is dependent on a microtubule-mediated separation of the new and old flagellar basal bodies during the cell cycle. This unique system may represent the remnants of an evolutionary archaic mechanism for genome segregation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Vickerman, K. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 56, 487–495 (1962).

  2. 2

    Robertson, M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B203, 161–184 (1913).

  3. 3

    Simpson, L. J. Protozool. 15, 132–136 (1968).

  4. 4

    Molyneux, D. H. Parasitology 59, 55–66 (1969).

  5. 5

    Lewis, D. H. J. Protozool. 22, 344–352 (1975).

  6. 6

    Steinert, M., Van Assel, S. & Steinert, G. in Biochemistry of Parasites and Host-Parasite Relationships (ed. Van den Bossche, H.) 193–202 (Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, 1976).

  7. 7

    Souto-Padron, T., De Souza, W. & Heuser, J. E. J. Cell Sci. 69, 167–178 (1984).

  8. 8

    Hiruki, T. Zentbl. Bakt. Mikrobiol. Hyg. 264, 392–398 (1987).

  9. 9

    Woods, A. et al. J. Cell Sci. 93, 491–500 (1989).

  10. 10

    Sherwin, T. & Gull, K. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B323, 573–588 (1989).

  11. 11

    Chow, K. C., Macdonald, T. L. & Ross, W. E. Molec. Pharmacol. 34, 467–473 (1988).

  12. 12

    Patel, S. Austin, C. A. & Fisher, L. M. Anticancer Drug Des. 5, 149–157 (1990).

  13. 13

    Shapiro, T. A. & Englund, P. T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 950–954 (1990).

  14. 14

    Ootso, K. et al. Cancer Res. 40, 1707–1717 (1980).

  15. 15

    Brun, R. & Schonenberger, M. Acta trop. 36, 289–292 (1979).

  16. 16

    Sherwin, T., Schneider, A., Sasse, R., Seebeck, T. & Gull, K. J. Cell Biol. 104, 439–446 (1987).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Medical School, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK

    • Derrick R. Robinson
    •  & Keith Gull

Authors

  1. Search for Derrick R. Robinson in:

  2. Search for Keith Gull in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/352731a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.