Letter | Published:

The first surface faulting from a historical intraplate earthquake in North America

Naturevolume 352pages617619 (1991) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

ALTHOUGH many fault ruptures are known from the boundaries of the Earth's lithospheric plates, the 'stable' interiors of continents are much less active1. Worldwide, only ten historical intraplate earthquakes are known to have produced surface faulting2 and none of these was in eastern North America. Despite the confirmed prehistoric rupture of the Meers fault3, some have wondered if intraplate earthquakes in the stable North American craton might somehow be different from plate-boundary earthquakes, and hence fail to rupture the surface4. This is an important consideration for seismic hazard assessments. When the Ungava earthquake (with magnitude (Ms) 6.3 and apparent shallow depth) occurred on 25 December 1989 in northern Canada, we (and, independently, A. Johnston of Memphis State University) concluded that it might have produced surface faulting. Here we report that there was indeed a surface rupture, 8.5 km long, with up to 1.8 m of reverse faulting on a steeply dipping, arcuate fault plane. The faulting confirms the seismological process and indicates that there is a hazard from ground-rupturing earthquakes in eastern North America, but the poor surface expression shows that finding prehistoric fault ruptures in order to constrain seismic hazard estimates will be difficult.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Johnston, A. C. & Kanter, L. R. Scient. Am. 262(3), 68–75 (1990).

  2. 2

    Johnston, A. C. & Bullard, T. Seismol. Res. Lett. 61, 152–153 (1990).

  3. 3

    Crone, A. J. & Luza, K. V. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 102, 1–17 (1990).

  4. 4

    Wu, F. T. Seismol. Res. Lett. 59, 251–260 (1988).

  5. 5

    Gordon, F. R. & Lewis, J. D. Bull. geol. Surv. W. Austr. 126, 1–229 (1980).

  6. 6

    McCue, K. et al. EOS 68, 609–612 (1987).

  7. 7

    Choy, G. L. & Bowman, J. R. J. geophys. Res. 95, 6867–6882 (1990).

  8. 8

    Mansinha, L. & Smylie, D. E. Bull. seismol. Soc. Am. 61, 1433–1440 (1971).

  9. 9

    National Earthquake Information Service Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, December 1989 (Golden, Colorado, 1990).

  10. 10

    Ebel, J. E., Somerville, P. G. & McIver, J. D. J. geophys. Res. 91, 8231–8247 (1986).

  11. 11

    North, R. G. et al. Seismol. Res. Lett. 60, 89–93 (1989).

  12. 12

    Basham, P. W. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 558, 1–10 (1989).

  13. 13

    Amick, D. & Gelenas, R. Science 251, 655–658 (1991).

  14. 14

    Obermeier, S. F. et al. Science 251, 1061–1063 (1991).

  15. 15

    Doig, R. Can. J. Earth Sci. 23, 930–937 (1986).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, 1 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, K1A OY3, Canada

    • John Adams
    • , R. J. Wetmiller
    • , H. S. Hasegawa
    •  & J. Drysdale

Authors

  1. Search for John Adams in:

  2. Search for R. J. Wetmiller in:

  3. Search for H. S. Hasegawa in:

  4. Search for J. Drysdale in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/352617a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.