Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Large disparity between gallium and antimony self-diffusion in gallium antimonide

Abstract

The most fundamental mass transport process in solids is self-diffusion. The motion of host-lattice (‘self-’) atoms in solids is mediated by point defects such as vacancies or interstitial atoms, whose formation and migration enthalpies determine the kinetics of this thermally activated process1,2. Self-diffusion studies also contribute to the understanding of the diffusion of impurities, and a quantitative understanding of self- and foreign-atom diffusion in semiconductors is central to the development of advanced electronic devices. In the past few years, self-diffusion studies have been performed successfully with isotopically controlled semiconductor heterostructures of germanium3, silicon4, gallium arsenide5,6 and gallium phosphide7. Self-diffusion studies with isotopically controlled GaAs and GaP have been restricted to Ga self-diffusion, as only Ga has two stable isotopes, 69Ga and 71Ga. Here we report self-diffusion studies with an isotopically controlled multilayer structure of crystalline GaSb. Two stable isotopes exist for both Ga and Sb, allowing the simultaneous study of diffusion on both sublattices. Our experiments show that near the melting temperature, Ga diffuses more rapidly than Sb by over three orders of magnitude. This surprisingly large difference in atomic mobility requires a physical explanation going beyond standard diffusion models. Combining our data for Ga and Sb diffusion with related results for foreign-atom diffusion in GaSb (refs 8, 9), we conclude that the unusually slow Sb diffusion in GaSb is a consequence of reactions between defects on the Ga and Sb sublattices, which suppress the defects that are required for Sb diffusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Concentration–depth profiles of Ga and Sb isotopes in GaSb isotope heterostructures measured with SIMS.
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficients D of Ga, Sb and In in GaSb.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group III , Vol. 26, Pt B, Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys (ed. Mehrer, H.) (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

  2. Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group III , Vol. 33, Pt A Diffusion in Semiconductors (ed. Beke, D. L.) (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

  3. Fuchs, H. D. et al.70Ge/ 74Ge isotope heterostructures: an approach to self-diffusion studies. Phys. Rev. B 51, 16817–16821 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bracht, H., Haller, E. E. & Clark-Phelps, R. Silicon self-diffusion in isotope heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 393– 396 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, L. et al. Ga self-diffusion in GaAs isotope heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2342–2345 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bracht, H., Norseng, M., Haller, E. E., Eberl, K. & Cardona, M. Enhanced and retarded Ga self-diffusion in Si and Be doped GaAs isotope heterostructures. Solid State Commun. 112, 301–314 ( 1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. et al. Gallium self-diffusion in gallium phosphide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1831–1833 ( 1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathiot, D. & Edelin, G. Diffusion of indium in GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 41, 447–458 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Edelin, G. & Mathiot, D. A model for the determination of the defect concentrations in III-V compounds: The case of GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 42, 95–110 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gude, A. & Mehrer, H. Diffusion in the D03-type intermetallic phase Fe3Si. Phil. Mag. A 76, 1–29 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Salamon, M. & Mehrer, H. Diffusion in the B20-type phase FeSi. Phil. Mag. A 79, 2137– 2155 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bösker, G. et al. Arsenic diffusion in intrinsic gallium arsenide. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 527, 347– 356 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiler, D. & Mehrer, H. Self-diffusion of gallium and antimony in GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 49, 309– 325 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, X.-P., Geyer, U., Busch, R., Johnson, W. L. & Wu, Y. Diffusion mechanisms in metallic supercooled liquids and glasses. Nature 402, 160– 162 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Talwar, D. N. & Ting, C. S. Tight-binding calculations for the electronic structure of isolated vacancies and impurities in III-V compound semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 25, 2660– 2680 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, H. Electronic structure of neutral and charged vacancies in Ga-related III-V compound semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 4077– 4086 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kühn, W., Strehlow, R. & Hanke, M. Self-consistent tight-binding investigation of chemical trends for native defects in III-V semiconductors. Phys. Status Solidi B 151, 541–557 ( 1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walukiewicz, W. Mechanism of Fermi level stabilization in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 37, 4760–4763 ( 1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walukiewicz, W. Amphoteric native defects in semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2094–2096 ( 1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.B. acknowledges a Feodor Lynen fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung. This work was supported in part by the Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science Division of the US Department of Energy, and the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Haller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bracht, H., Nicols, S., Walukiewicz, W. et al. Large disparity between gallium and antimony self-diffusion in gallium antimonide. Nature 408, 69–72 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35040526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35040526

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing