Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality

Article metrics

Abstract

FEMALE choice of mates based on the expression of characters that correlate with male quality remains a controversial and largely untested idea1. By choosing quality males, females stand to gain resources2, genetic benefits for their offspring3–5, or both. In the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), male plumage coloration is a function of dietary intake of carotenoids6,7. Here I present results of field studies that indicate that females prefer to mate with colourful males and that plumage brightness correlates with a male's capactity for parental care and perhaps its genotypic quality. Artificially brightened males paired more quickly and frequently than sham control or lightened males. Among unmanipulated males, plumage coloration was correlated with nest attentiveness and overwinter survival. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the coloration of fathers and sons.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B. (eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (Wiley, New York, 1987).

  2. 2

    Hoelzer, G. A. Anim. Behav. 38, 1067–1078 (1989).

  3. 3

    Zahavi, A. J. theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).

  4. 4

    Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

  5. 5

    Andersson, M. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).

  6. 6

    Brush, A. H. & Power, D. M. Auk 93, 725–739 (1976).

  7. 7

    Hill, G. E. Auk (in the press).

  8. 8

    Gill, D. E. & Lanyon, W. E. Bird-Banding 36, 1–14 (1965).

  9. 9

    Hill, G. E. Anim. Behav. 40, 563–572 (1990).

  10. 10

    Thompson, W. L. Condor 62, 245–271 (1960).

  11. 11

    Michener, H. & Michener, J. R. Condor 33, 12–19 (1931).

  12. 12

    Bergtoid, W. H. Auk 30, 40–73 (1913).

  13. 13

    Crespi, B. J. & Bookstein, F. L. Evolution 43, 18–29 (1989).

  14. 14

    Andersson, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

  15. 15

    Dominey, W. J. J. theor. Biol. 101, 495–502 (1983).

  16. 16

    Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Am. Nat. 124, 309–323 (1984).

  17. 17

    Nur, N. & Hasson, O. J. theor. Biol. 110, 275–297 (1984).

  18. 18

    Endler, J. A. Evolution 34, 76–91 (1980).

  19. 19

    Endler, J. A. Environ, biol. Fishes 9, 173–190 (1983).

  20. 20

    Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 199–205 (1985).

  21. 21

    Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 393–401 (1989).

  22. 22

    Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. Nature 344, 330–333 (1990).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, G. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337–339 (1991) doi:10.1038/350337a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.