Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to virus-infected non-haematopoietic cells requires presentation of exogenous antigen

Article metrics

Abstract

Originally published as Nature 398, 77—80; 1999

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are thought to detect viral infections by monitoring the surface of all cells for the presence of viral peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. In most cells, peptides presented by MHC class I molecules are derived exclusively from proteins synthesized by the antigen-bearing cells1. Macrophages and dendritic cells also have an alternative MHC class I pathway that can present peptides derived from extracellular antigens; however, the physiological role of this process is unclear2. Here we show that virally infected non-haematopoietic cells are unable to stimulate primary CTL-mediated immunity directly. Instead, bone-marrow-derived cells are required as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to initiate anti-viral CTL responses. In these APCs, the alternative (exogenous) MHC class I pathway is the obligatory mechanism for the initiation of CTL responses to viruses that infect only non-haematopoietic cells.

Main

The ‘classical’ MHC class I antigen-presentation pathway is thought to be the major mechanism used by the immune system to detect viral infections in all cells. In this pathway, proteins synthesized by a cell are degraded in the cytoplasm into oligopeptides, a fraction of which are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP). In the ER these peptides bind to new MHC class I molecules and the resulting complexes are transported to the cell surface. As MHC class I molecules must bind peptides in order to be transported to the plasma membrane, TAP is required for normal MHC class I expression at the cell surface and for antigen presentation1.

To determine whether non-haematopoietic cells can function as APCs to initiate CTL responses to viruses, we constructed bone-marrow chimaeras by lethally irradiating C57Bl/6 mice (B6 mice; MHC class I haplotype H-2b) and reconstituting them with bone marrow from TAP0/0 mice3 (also H-2b; all bone-marrow chimaeras will be referred to as bone-marrow donor → irradiated recipient). As bone-marrow-derived cells in TAP0/0 → B6 mice cannot transfer peptides from the cytosol to the ER, they are unable to use the classical MHC class I pathway3,4.

The chimaeric mice were assayed for the generation of CTL responses following infection with wild-type vaccinia virus or with vaccinia–OVA, a recombinant vaccinia virus carrying chicken ovalbumin (OVA) as a full-length protein5. Although they have intact MHC class I antigen presentation in non-haematopoietic tissues, TAP0/0 → B6 mice did not generate CTL responses to vaccinia-viral antigens (Fig. 1a) or to OVA (Fig.1b). In contrast, robust CTL responses to these antigens were detected in control B6 → B6 mice. These results indicate that the generation of CTL responses to vaccinia virus requires bone-marrow-derived cells with functional TAP molecules.

Figure 1: CTL responses to wild-type vaccinia virus and OVA in recombinant vaccinia virus requires a bone-marrow-derived APC.
figure1

a, CTL response to wild-type vaccinia. The indicated bone-marrow chimaeras were infected with 2 × 107 p.f.u. of wild-type vaccinia virus. One week later, mice were killed and freshly explanted spleen cells were assayed in 51Cr-release assays on vaccinia-infected MC57G cells (filled squares) or uninfected MC57G cells as controls (open circles). The TAP0/0 → B6 mice did not generate a response to the vaccinia-viral antigens. b, CTL response to OVA in vaccinia–OVA protein. The indicated bone-marrow chimaeras were infected with 2 × 107 p.f.u. of vaccinia–OVA. One week later, mice were killed and their spleen cells were cultured in the presence of mitomycin-C (Sigma)-treated EG7 cells29 (an EL-4-derived cell line stably transfected with OVA). After five days cells were collected and tested in 51Cr-release assays on EG7 targets (filled squares) on EL-4 targets as controls (open circles). c, CTL response to vaccinia–SS-SIINFEKL. The experiment was performed as in b except that mice were infected with vaccinia–SS-SIINFEKL. The x-axis shows the ratio of effector cells to target cells.

Next, we determined whether the inability of TAP0/0 → B6 mice to generate CTL responses was due to a defect in CD8+ T cells or to a failure in antigen presentation by bone-marrow-derived APCs. TAP0/0 (non-chimaeric) mice almost completely lack CD8+ T cells because expression of MHC class I molecules in epithelial thymic cells is necessary for the positive selection of CD8+ T cells in the thymus3. However, as shown by flow-cytometry analysis, TAP0/0 → B6 mice had normal numbers of CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood and spleen (ref. 4 and data not shown) as a consequence of positive selection on wild-type thymic epithelial cells (which are radioresistant and non-haematopoietic). These CD8+ T cells were fully functional. TAP0/0 → B6 mice and control B6 → B6 mice generated a similar CTL response to vaccinia–SS-SIINFEKL5 (Fig.1c), a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the antigenic peptide of OVA (SIINFEKL)6 preceded by a signal sequence that delivers the peptide directly into the ER, thus bypassing the need for TAP. TAP0/0 → B6 chimaeras and control mice also generated anti-SIINFEKL CTL when injected intravenously with a graded number of B6 dendritic cells that had been preincubated with a single concentration of synthetic SIINFEKL (not shown) or when injected with 5 × 105 dendritic cells that had been incubated with graded concentrations of SIINFEKL (Fig. 2). In these latter experiments, cells incubated with 10 nM SIINFEKL and cells infected in vitro with vaccinia–OVA and polio–OVA (see below) stimulated a T-cell hybrid specific for the peptide–MHC complex SIINFEKL–Kb at roughly similar levels (data not shown).

Figure 2: TAP0/0 → B6 mice can generate CTL responses comparable to those in B6 → B6 mice when immunized with APCs loaded with antigenic peptide.
figure2

The indicated chimaeric mice were immunized intravenously with 5 × 105 B6-derived, in vitro-cultured dendritic cells that had been incubated with SIINFEKL peptide at the indicated concentrations. One week later mice were killed and their spleen cells restimulated in vitro for 4 days with mitomycin-C-treated EL-4 cells that had been incubated with SIINFEKL. For each panel, squares represent one mouse and circles represent another. Targets were EL-4 cells that had been preincubated with SIINFEKL (filled symbols) or EL-4 cells that had not been incubated with peptide as controls (open symbols).

These results indicate that the inability of TAP0/0 → B6 mice to generate a CTL response to vaccinia virus is due to a failure of antigen presentation. This failure to present antigens did not result from an inability of the TAP0/0 → B6 chimaeras to reconstitute bone-marrow-derived APCs, because these mice generated MHC class II-restricted T-cell responses to OVA that were at least as strong as those generated by B6 → B6 animals (Fig. 3a, b ). Together these data show that bone-marrow-derived professional APCs, possessing a functional TAP, are required to initiate CTL responses to vaccinia, and that non-haematopoietic tissues infected with vaccinia cannot prime CTLs, despite the ability of vaccinia to infect many different tissues, including respiratory organs, liver, kidney, spleen, ovaries and the central nervous system7,8,9. There may be several explanations for the inability of non-haematopoietic cells to stimulate a CTL response. Although non-haematopoietic cells are able to present antigenic peptides bound to MHC class I, they express low levels of these molecules in the absence of inflammation. Moreover, they do not express MHC class II molecules, which are essential for the stimulation of CD4+ helper T cells, and they lack adhesion and co-stimulatory molecules that might be required to stimulate naive T cells. Non-immune cells also lack the ability to migrate to lymphoid organs, where many immune responses are initiated10. On the other hand, some bone-marrow-derived cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, express high levels of MHC class I and class II molecules and several adhesion and co-stimulatory molecules, including B7.1 and B7.2, and can migrate to central lymphoid organs. However, after naive CTLs are stimulated to become effectors, they no longer require co-stimulation or T-cell help and can recognize lower levels of peptide–MHC complexes. Therefore, once stimulated by professional APCs, the effector CTLs acquire the ability to migrate out of the lymphoid organs to clear viral infections in all tissues.

Figure 3: TAP0/0 → B6 mice can generate MHC class II-restricted responses comparable to those in B6 → B6 mice.
figure3

a, Production of IL-2 by lymph-node cells of immunized chimaeras in response to different concentrations of OVA. Cells were from OVA-immunized TAP0/0 → B6 mice (filled squares) and B6 → B6 mice (filled circles) or from unimmunized controls (open squares and open circles respectively). b, The same cells as those used in a were incubated with 0.5 mg ml−1 OVA in the presence of the indicated antibody-containing supernatants. Only the results for immunized TAP0/0 → B6 mice (filled columns) or B6 → B6 mice (open columns) are shown.

In the experimental model described above, bone-marrow-derived APCs might acquire the viral antigens by becoming infected themselves11. In fact, SIINFEKL was presented by vaccinia-OVA infected dendritic cells and macrophages in vitro (not shown). However, it seems unlikely that professional APCs would become infected by all viruses and therefore this mechanism would be unavailable to detect infections by many tissue-specific viruses. Alternatively, the bone-marrow-derived APCs might acquire vaccinia-viral antigens exogenously from other antigen-bearing cells and this mechanism could operate in all infections, as proposed previously2,12. To determine whether the presentation of exogenous antigen is important in viral immunity, we developed a model in which bone-marrow-derived cells could not be infected with a virus.

Poliovirus (polio) is a positive-strand RNA virus with a host range that includes humans but not mice. This host-range restriction is determined by the expression of a suitable poliovirus receptor (PVR) on host cells13. Cells from wild-type mice can not be infected with polio, but mouse cells transfected with human PVR can be infected ( ref. 14 and data not shown). In this study we used two human PVR-transgenic mice. We constructed a transgenic mouse (cPVR, in an ICR background) expressing a full-length PVR complementary DNA, driven by the β-actin promoter, in all tissues studied. Such mice are susceptible to polio infection and die with poliomyelitis following injection with wild-type polio (not shown). Following intraperitoneal infection of cPVR and control (B6) mice with the wild-type strain of polio, we found much higher titres of virus (expressed as plaque-forming units per tissue) in the skeletal muscle (12, 000), brain (1, 600) and spinal cord (19, 000), and slightly higher titres in the kidney (1.3) and liver (0.64), of the cPVR mice (B6-mouse titres: 0.70, <0.60, <0.30, <0.10 and <0.20, respectively). We mated cPVR mice with B6 mice, and their progeny, (cPVR × B6) F1 mice (referred to here as cPVR mice), were used here. Another transgenic mouse strain (referred to here as gPVR) possesses the human PVR genomic locus, including the endogenous human promoter, backcrossed onto the B6 background. It also supports viral replication in skeletal muscle and central nervous system13,15.

To examine the role of the exogenous MHC class I pathway in the initiation of CTL responses, we generated a series of bone-marrow-chimaeric mice, including two sets (B6 → cPVR and B6 → gPVR) that allowed infection of only non-bone-marrow-derived cells. In a previous study14, we constructed a polio virus recombinant (polio–OVA) expressing the carboxy-terminal half of OVA (which includes the SIINFEKL epitope). In this construct, the OVA fragment is synthesized as part of the viral polyprotein and is released in the cytosol by viral proteinases. We showed that polio–OVA can induce anti-OVA CTL responses in gPVR mice and cPVR but not in B6 mice (ref. 14 and data not shown). Consistent with this result, cPVR → cPVR mice infected with polio–OVA generated anti-OVA CTLs (Fig. 4Ac), but B6 → B6 mice did not (Fig.4Ad). B6 → cPVR chimaeric mice, which have bone-marrow-derived cells that cannot be infected by polio (PVR-negative cells), generated strong anti-OVA CTL responses when infected with polio–OVA (Fig. 4Aa) but not when infected with a recombinant polio (polio–sp27) expressing an irrelevant protein ( Fig. 4Ae). Identical results were obtained when using gPVR recipients (Fig. 4Ba, c and e). Therefore, either the infected non-haematopoietic cells are stimulating CTL responses, or bone-marrow-derived cells are acquiring the polio-expressed OVA from exogenous sources.

Figure 4: Initiation of the CTL response to polio–OVA requires the presence of bone-marrow-derived APCs, but not their infection.
figure4

Each panel corresponds to a single experiment. A, B, Bone-marrow chimaeras (Aae, cPVR recipients and B6 control recipients; Bae, gPVR recipients and B6 control recipients) were infected with polio–OVA or polio–sp27 as indicated. Mice were killed 3 weeks later and their spleen cells were co-cultured for 5 days with mitomycin-C-treated EG7 cells and used in 51Cr-release assays. Filled squares, EG7 targets; open circles, EL-4 targets as controls. Cad , Bone-marrow chimaeras obtained using gPVR recipients and B6 control recipients were infected with polio–OVA. Three weeks later, mice were killed and their spleen cells were cultured in the presence of mitomycin-C-treated EL-4 cells that had been preincubated with 2 µg ml−1 of the Db-binding polio-derived peptide P22. After 5 days, cells were collected and tested in 51Cr-release assays. Targets were EL-4 cells preincubated with P22 (filled squares) or EL-4 cells without peptide as controls (open circles).

To distinguish between these two possibilities, we constructed chimaeric mice by using TAP0/0 mice as bone-marrow donors and PVR+ transgenic mice as recipients. Remarkably, TAP0/0 → cPVR (Fig. 4Ab) and TAP0/0 → gPVR (Fig. 4Bb) mice did not generate anti-OVA CTL responses when infected with polio–OVA. As expected, their CTLs were functional and generated a strong response to vaccinia–SS-SIINFEKL (data not shown). In contrast to the control B6 → gPVR mice, these TAP0/0 chimaeric mice also failed to generate CTL responses to a Db-presented epitope from the polio VP0 protein (Fig. 4C). As shown above with vaccinia virus, these data indicate that non-haematopoietic cells are unable to stimulate CTL immunity to another virus, indicating that this may be a general rule. These results also indicate that the bone-marrow-derived cells in B6 → c/gPVR mice acquired antigen from exogenous sources. That TAP0/0 → c/gPVR mice did not respond to either antigen also indicates that the response in B6 → c/gPVR mice was not due to residual PVR+ bone-marrow-derived cells that survived irradiation.

Until now, the physiological function of the exogenous MHC class I pathway has been unclear. Stimulation of CTLs by this route has been shown to occur in several situations, such as transplantation (‘crosspriming’ for minor histocompatibility antigens)16 and injection of particulate antigens17, but it has been thought to make a minor contribution to overall responses. Two situations in which this pathway has been shown to be important are in the generation of CTL responses to a tumour4 and in the homing and development of tolerance of adoptively transferred T cells specific for a transgenic antigen expressed in pancreatic β-cells18,19. However, in these cases it was unclear whether the exogenous pathway might be dominant only because of the lack of inflammation (which stimulates antigen presentation and provides an adjuvant effect) and/or because these cells might be poor stimulators. It has been suggested that the exogenous MHC class I pathway is inefficient and unlikely to play an important part in most physiological situations20. Our experiments with B6 → c/g PVR mice contradict this view and indicate that the exogenous MHC class I pathway is essential for the initiation of CTL responses to viral infection that is confined to non-haematopoietic tissues. In fact, if this pathway did not exist, viruses could escape immune surveillance by using receptors that are not expressed on the critical, bone-marrow-derived APCs. Our results indicate that the presentation of exogenous antigen is a major pathway in vivo and may contribute to the stimulation of CTL responses even in situations in which viruses may infect bone-marrow-derived cells.

How do bone-marrow-derived cells acquire viral exogenous antigens? When infected cells die in vivo, they are rapidly cleared by bone-marrow-derived phagocytes, which will import the viral antigens into the exogenous MHC class I and class II pathways21. Interestingly, antigens from apoptotic cells are avidly presented on class I molecules of dendritic cells22. Although our results do not specifically establish the identity of the bone-marrow-derived APCs responsible for initiating CTL responses through the exogenous pathway, macrophages and/or dendritic cells are again the likely candidates, because they can present antigen through the exogenous MHC class I pathway in vitro 17,23. These cells can also ingest dying cells and cellular debris by phagocytosis and can thereby import viral antigens into the exogenous MHC class I pathway. Moreover, their migratory nature allows them to acquire antigen at a site of infection and then travel to the lymphoid tissues.

Two routes for the exogenous MHC class I pathway in vitro have been described, a TAP-independent pathway, in which antigen is probably hydrolysed in endosomes24,25, and a phagosome-to-cytosol pathway26 that is TAP-dependent. Our data provide indirect evidence that, in vivo, vaccinia–OVA and polio–OVA antigens may follow the TAP-dependent exogenous MHC class I pathway.

Our results show a strict requirement for professional APCs in the generation of anti-viral CTL immunity, and demonstrate that the exogenous pathway plays a key part in the immune surveillance of non-haematopoietic tissues. These findings have implications for vaccine delivery and gene therapy as well as for immune evasion by viruses. The results indicate that, to stimulate strong immunity, viral vectors or naked DNA must be expressed in professional APCs or delivered in a manner that will promote exogenous antigen presentation. Moreover, these mechanisms may limit the ability of viruses to block the generation of CTLs by downregulating MHC class I expression on infected cells27, because this is unlikely to affect the exogenous pathway in uninfected professional APCs.

Methods

TAP0/0 (B6, 129-Tap1tp 1Arp; Jackson Laboratory) and B6 (Taconic) mice were obtained at 6–8 weeks of age. cPVR mice were made by standard transgenic techniques using the plasmid pVR-9, which has already been described14. gPVR mice (a gift from Cynamid) were bred at UMMC animal facilities. To prepare chimaeras, bone-marrow cells from 1–3-month-old donor mice were treated with anti-Thy1 antibody (M5/49.4.1; ATCC) and complement to eliminate mature T cells, washed twice and resuspended in PBS. Recipients were irradiated with 650 rad and then with 450 rad 4 h later. Irradiated mice were reconstituted by intravenous inoculation of 4–6 × 106 bone-marrow cells from the different donors. To avoid rejection of donor MHC class I-negative TAP0/0 cells by host natural-killer cells, chimaeras also received an intraperitoneal injection of 10 µl rabbit anti-asialo GM1 gammaglobulin (Wako Chemicals) on the day of the transplant, and a second injection 3 days later. Bone-marrow chimaeras were rested for 4–6 months following reconstitution to allow for complete elimination of host-derived professional APCs. Mice were inoculated with virus and CTL killing was measured from fresh spleen cells (wild-type vaccinia), or from cultures restimulated with antigen for 5 days, using a 51Cr-release assay as described28. For MHC class II-restricted responses, mice were injected at the base of the tail with 100 µg OVA (Sigma) emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (Gibco) in a final volume of 50 µl. Ten days later mice were killed and 2 × 105 cells from pooled para-aortic lymph nodes were incubated for 48 h in triplicate wells of microtitre plates in the presence of OVA. Supernatants were assayed for the presence of interleukin (IL)-2 by measuring the incorporation of 3H-thymidine by the IL-2-dependent cell line CTLL. When indicated, antibodies were added to culture as a 1:8 dilution of hybridoma culture supernatants. The antibodies M5/114, Y-3 and BBM.1 (ATCC) were used as anti-MHC class II, anti-MHC class I and control antibodies, respectively. All experiments were performed at least three times. Data points in all figures except Fig. 2 represent averages ± s.e.m. for three mice (all experimental groups) or two mice (vaccinia–SS-SIINFEKL; polio–sp27 controls). In Fig.2, two mice were used per group and results from these mice are shown individually. All mice used in these experiments were housed at the UMMC animal facilities and experiments were conducted in compliance with NIH and institutional guidelines.

Viruses were produced and used as described14,28 except that inoculation of mice with polio was performed intravenously rather than intraperitoneally. For the generation of CTL responses to all viruses, the inoculation dose was 2 × 107 plaque-forming units (p.f.u.) per mouse diluted in 0.5 ml PBS. For the recovery of infectious virus from organs, mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 2 × 108 p.f.u. of the poliovirus wild-type Mahoney 1 strain. Six paralysed cPVR mice were killed at days 4.5–6.5 after infection. Four control B6 mice were killed at days 4.5–5.5. Tissue samples were homogenized, and poliovirus titres in each tissue were determined by plaque assay.

P22 is a Db-binding peptide corresponding to amino acids 22–30 of the poliovirus polyprotein that we have recently identified (L.J.S. and K.L.R., manuscript in preparation). Both SIINFEKL and P22 were synthesized at the peptide core facility at UMMC.

All cell lines used in this study have been described and were cultured as previously28. To obtain dendritic cells, bone-marrow cells obtained from B6 mice were incubated overnight in RPMI media (Irvine Scientific) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Atlanta Biologicals), 5 × 10−5 M 2-mercaptolethanol (Sigma) and 2 mM L-glutamine, antibiotics (Fungi-Bact), 0.01 M HEPES buffer and non-essential amino acids (all from Irvine Scientific). Non-adherent cells were collected and grown in the same media supplemented with 10 ng ml−1 granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and 5 ng ml−1 IL-4 (Pharmingen) for 5–6 days with further addition of cytokines every other day. Most cells in these cultures were dendritic cells, as judged by morphology and analysis expression of specific markers by flow cytometry. Before being injected into mice, 3 × 106 dendritic cells were thoroughly washed in PBS, resuspended in 1 ml PBS containing the indicated concentrations of SIINFEKL and 10 µg human β2 -microglobin (Calbiochem) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Following incubation the cells were washed in PBS and injected intravenously into mice.

References

  1. 1

    York, I. A. & Rock, K. L. Antigen processing and presentation by the class I major histocompatibility complex. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 369–396 ( 1996).

  2. 2

    Rock, K. L. Anew foreign policy: MHC class I molecules monitor the outside world. Immunol. Today 17, 131–137 (1996).

  3. 3

    Van Kaer, L., Ashton-Rickardt, P. G., Ploegh, H. L. & Tonegawa, S. TAP1 mutant mice are deficient in antigen presentation, surface class I molecules, and CD4-8+ T cells. Cell 71, 1205– 1214 (1992).

  4. 4

    Huang, A. Y., Bruce, A. T., Pardoll, D. M. & Levitsky, H. I. In vivo cross-priming of MHC class I-restricted antigens requires the TAP transporter. Immunity 4, 349– 355 (1996).

  5. 5

    Restifo, N. P.et al. Antigen processing in vivo and the elicitation of primary CTL responses. J. Immunol. 154, 4414– 4422 (1995).

  6. 6

    Rotzschke, O.et al. Exact prediction of a natural T cell epitope. Eur. J. Immunol. 21, 2891–2894 (1991).

  7. 7

    Lee, M. S.et al. Molecular attenuation of vaccinia virus: mutant generation and animal characterization. J. Virol. 66, 2617 –2630 (1992).

  8. 8

    Taylor, G., Stott, E. J., Wertz, G. & Ball, A. Comparison of the virulence of wild-type thymidine kinase (tk)-deficient and tk+ phenotypes of vaccinia virus recombinants after intranasal inoculation of mice. J. Gen. Virol. 72, 125–130 (1991).

  9. 9

    Buller, R. M., Smith, G. L., Cremer, K., Notkins, A. L. & Moss, B. Decreased virulence of recombinant vaccinia virus expresison vectors is associated with a thymidine kinase-negative phenotype. Nature 317, 813–815 ( 1985).

  10. 10

    Kundig, T. M.et al. Fibroblasts as efficient antigen-presenting cells in lymphoid organs. Science 268, 1343– 1347 (1995).

  11. 11

    Zinkernagel, R. M., Kreeb, G. & Althage, A. Lymphohemopoietic origin of the immunogenic, virus-antigen-presenting cells triggering anti-viral T-cell responses. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 15, 565–576 ( 1980).

  12. 12

    Bevan, M. J. Minor H antigens introduced on H-2 different stimulating cells crossreact at the cytotoxic T cell level during in vivo priming. J. Immunol. 117, 2233–2238 (1976).

  13. 13

    Ren, R. B., Costantini, F., Gorgacz, E. J., Lee, J. J. & Racaniello, V. R. Transgenic mice expressing a human poliovirus receptor: a new model for poliomyelitis. Cell 63, 353–362 ( 1990).

  14. 14

    Mandl, S., Sigal, L. J., Rock, K. L. & Andino, R. Poliovirus vaccine vectors elicit antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells and protect mice against lethal challenge with malignant melanoma cells expressing a model antigen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8216 –8221 (1998).

  15. 15

    Ren, R. & Racaniello, V. R. Human poliovirus receptor gene expression and poliovirus tissue tropism in transgenic mice. J. Virol. 66, 296–304 ( 1992).

  16. 16

    Bevan, M. J. Cross-priming for a secondary cytotoxic response to minor H antigens with H-2 congenic cells which do not cross-react in the cytotoxic assay. J. Exp. Med. 143, 1283–1288 (1976).

  17. 17

    Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M., Clark, K., Benacerraf, B. & Rock, K. L. Efficient major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of exogenous antigen upon phagocytosis by macrophages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 4942–4946 ( 1993).

  18. 18

    Kurts, C., Kosaka, H., Carbone, F. R., Miller, J. F. & Heath, W. R. Class I-restricted cross-presentation of exogenous self-antigens leads to deletion of autoreactive CD8(+) T cells. J. Exp. Med. 186, 239–245 (1997).

  19. 19

    Kurts, C.et al. Constitutive class I-restricted exogenous presentation of self antigens in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 184, 923–930 (1996).

  20. 20

    Reis e Sousa, C. & Germain, R. N. Major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of peptides derived from soluble exogenous antigen by a subset of cells engaged in phagocytosis. J. Exp. Med. 182, 841–851 (1995).

  21. 21

    Rock, K. L. & Clark, K. Analysis of the role of MHC class II presentation in the stimulation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by antigens targeted into the exogenous antigen–MHC class I presentation pathway. J. Immunol. 156, 3721–3726 (1996).

  22. 22

    Albert, M. L., Sauter, B. & Bhardwaj, N. Dendritic cells acquire antigen from apoptotic cells and induce class I-restricted CTLs. Nature 392, 86–89 (1998).

  23. 23

    Shen, Z., Reznikoff, G., Dranoff, G. & Rock, K. L. Cloned dendritic cells can present exogenous antigens on both MHC class I and class II molecules. J. Immunol. 158, 2723–2730 (1997).

  24. 24

    Pfeifer, J. D.et al . Phagocytic processing of bacterial antigens for class I MHC presentation to T cells. Nature 361, 359–362 (1993).

  25. 25

    Bachmann, M. F.et al . TAP1-independent loading of class I molecules by exogenous viral proteins. Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 1739 –1743 (1995).

  26. 26

    Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M. & Rock, K. L. Aphagosome-to-cytosol pathway for exogenous antigens presented on MHC class I molecules. Science 267, 243–253 ( 1995).

  27. 27

    Ploegh, H. L. Viral strategies of immune evasion. Science 280, 248–253 (1998).

  28. 28

    Sigal, L. J., Reiser, H. & Rock, K. L. The role of B7-1 and B7-2 costimulation for the generation of CTL responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 161, 2740–2745 (1998).

  29. 29

    Moore, M. W., Carbone, F. R. & Bevan, M. J. Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation. Cell 54, 777–785 (1988).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. O. Donis and the members of the Rock laboratory for helpful discussions; R. Welsh, L. Berg, G. Soldevila and N. Kisaiti for critical reading of the manuscript; W.Yong Zang and L. Rothstein for technical assistance; and M. Bevan for EG7 cells, P. Doherty for MC57G cells, and J. Yewdell for vaccinia-OVA and vaccinia SS-SIINFEKL. This work was supported by NIH grants to K.L.R. and R.A. L.J.S. was supported by an NIH Research Training Grant.

Author information

Correspondence to Kenneth L. Rock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigal, L., Crotty, S., Andino, R. et al. Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to virus-infected non-haematopoietic cells requires presentation of exogenous antigen. Nature 402, 25–29 (1999) doi:10.1038/35005528

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.