Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient

Abstract

READING and writing require access to stored knowledge about the spelling of words. Presumably, we recognize chair but not chare or chiar as a word of English, and similarly would write 'chair' but not 'chare' or 'chiar', because we access orthographic representations that specify the identity and the order of the graphemes (abstract letter representations) that comprise the spelling of words1,2. Thus, a fundamental problem concerns the content and structure of the hypothesized orthographic representations, and how information about grapheme order is represented and processed. We present evidence from a brain-damaged patient (N.G.) with unilateral neglect that this information is coded spatially. Unilateral neglect is a disorder clinically characterized by the inability to perceive or respond to stimuli presented to the side contralateral to the site of lesion, despite the absence of significant sensory or motor deficits3,4. The patient made reading and spelling errors only on the right half of words, regardless of length. Furthermore, she produced the same pattern of errors in reading and spelling, irrespective of the topographic arrangement of stimuli in reading (horizontal, vertical or mirror-reversed words) and of the type of response in spelling (written, oral or backward oral spelling). This pattern of performance suggests that order information in orthographic representations is coded spatially in a word-centred coordinate system; that is, in a spatially defined coordinate frame whose centre corresponds to the midpoint of a canonical, orientation-invariant representation of the word and not the midpoint of the word stimulus5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caramazza, A. & Miceli, G. in Brain and Reading (eds von Euler, V. et al. 257–268 (Stockton Press, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Prinzmetal, W. et al. J. Mem. Lang. 25, 461–475 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeRenzi, E. Disorders of Space Exploration and Cognition (Wiley, Chichester, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heilman, K. M. et al. in Clinical Neuropsychology (2nd ed.) (eds Heilman, K. M. & Valenstein, E.) 243–293 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monk, A. F. Q. Jl. exp. Psychol. A37, 613–625 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinsbourne, M. & Warrington, E. K. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 25, 334–339 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeRenzi, E. et al. Cortex 6, 191–203 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bisiach, E. et al. Brain 102, 609–618 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baxter, D. & Warrington, E. K. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 46, 1073–1078 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Costello, A. & Warrington, E. K. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 50, 1110–1116 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W. in Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect (ed. Jeannerod, M.) 151–182 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, A. et al. Cognitive Neuropsychol. 4, 439–464 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Behrmann, M. et al. Brain (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature 346, 267–269 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/346267a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/346267a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing