Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction

An Erratum to this article was published on 09 August 1990

Abstract

NEURONS in the visual cortex respond selectively to perceptually salient features of the visual scene, such as the direction and speed of moving objects, the orientation of local contours, or the colour or relative depth of a visual pattern. It is commonly assumed that the brain constructs its percept of the visual scene from information encoded in the selective responses of such neurons. We have now tested this hypothesis directly by measuring the effect on psychophysical performance of modifying the firing rates of physiologically characterized neurons. We required rhesus monkeys to report the direction of motion in a visual display while we electrically stimulated clusters of directionally selective neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT, or V5), an extrastriate area that plays a prominent role in the analysis of visual motion information1–8. Microstimulation biased the animals' judgements towards the direction of motion encoded by the stimulated neurons. This result indicates that physiological properties measured at the neuronal level can be causally related to a specific aspect of perceptual performance.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Dubner, R. & Zeki, S. M. Brain Res. 35, 528–532 (1971).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Zeki, S. M. J. Physiol. 236, 549–573 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Baker, J. F., Petersen, S. E., Newsome, W. T. & Allman, J. M. J. Neurophysiol. 45, 397–416 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Maunsell, J. H. R. & Van Essen, D. C. J. Neurophysiol. 49, 1127–1147 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Albright, T. D. J. Neurophysiol. 52, 1106–1130 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Newsome, W. T. & Paré, E. B. J. Neurosci. 8, 2201–2211 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Siegel, R. M. & Andersen, R. A. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 12, 1183 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Newsome, W. T., Britten, K. H. & Movshon, J. A. Nature 341, 52–54 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Albright, T. D., Desimone, R. & Gross, C. G. J. Neurophysiol. 51, 16–31 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Stoney, S. D., Jr., Thompson, W. D. & Asanuma, H. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 659–669 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Jankowska, E., Padel, Y. & Tanaka, R. J. Physiol. 249, 617–636 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ts'o, D. Y. & Gilbert, C. D. J. Neurosci. 8, 1712–1727 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. J. Neurosci. 9, 2432–2442 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Mikami, A., Newsome, W. T. & Wurtz, R. H. J. Neurophysiol. 55, 1308–1327 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Komatsu, H. & Wurtz, R. H. J. Neurophysiol. 62, 31–47 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Cox, D. R. Analysis of Binary Data (Methuen, London, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Newsome, W. T., Wurtz, R. H. & Komatsu, H. J. Neurophysiol. 60, 604–620 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Newsome, W. T., Wurtz, R. H., Dürsteler, M. R. & Mikami, A. J. Neurosci. 5, 825–840 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salzman, C., Britten, K. & Newsome, W. Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction. Nature 346, 174–177 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/346174a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing