Abstract
SEGMENTAL pattern formation in Drosophila proceeds in a hierarchical manner whereby the embryo is stepwise divided into progressively finer regions until it reaches its final metameric form1,2. Maternal genes initiate this process by imparting on the egg a distinct antero-posterior polarity and by directing from the two polar centres the activities of the zygotic genes3. The anterior system is strictly dependent on the product of the maternal gene bicoid (bcd), without which all pattern elements in the anterior region of the embryo fail to develop4. The posterior system seems to lack such a morphogen. Rather, the known posterior maternal determinants simply define the boundaries within which abdominal segmentation can occur, and the process that actively generates the abdominal body pattern may be entirely due to the interactions between the zygotic genes5–7. The most likely candidates among the zygotic genes that could fulfil the role of initiating the posterior pattern-forming process are the gap genes, as they are the first segmentation genes to be expressed in the embryo8–10. Here we describe the interactions between the gap genes Krüppel (Kr), knirps (kni) and tailless (tll). We show thatkniexpression is repressed by til activity, whereas it is directly enhanced by Kr activity. Thus, Kr activity is present throughout the domain of kni expression and forms a long-range protein gradient, which in combination with kni activity is required for abdominal segmentation of the embryo.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ingham, P. W. Nature 335, 25–34 (1988).
Akam, M. Development 101, 1–22 (1987).
Nüsslein-Volhard, C., Frohnhöfer, H. G. & Lehmann, R. Science 238, 1675–1681 (1987).
Frohnhöfer, H. G. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Nature 324, 120–125 (1986).
Hülskamp, M., Schröder, C., Pfeifle, C., Jäckle, H. & Tautz, D. Nature 338, 629–632 (1989).
Irish, V., Lehmann, R. & Akam, M. Nature 338, 646–648 (1989).
Struhl, G. Nature 338, 741–744 (1989).
Knipple, D. C., Seifert, E., Rosenberg, R. B., Preiss, A. & Jäckle, H. Nature 317, 40–44 (1985).
Tautz, D. et al. Nature 327, 383–389 (1987).
Nauber, U. et al. Nature 336, 489–492 (1988).
Wieschaus, E., Nüsslein-Volhard, C. & Kluding, H. Devl Biol. 104, 172–186 (1984).
Lehmann, R. Development (Suppl.) 104, 17–27 (1988).
Strecker, T. R., Kongsuwan, K., Lengyel, J. A. & Merriam, J. R. Devl Biol. 113, 64–71 (1986).
Rothe, M., Nauber, U. & Jäckle, H. EMBO J., in the press.
Rubin, G. M. & Spradling, A. C. Science 218, 348–353 (1982).
Klinger, M., Erdelyi, M., Szabad, J. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Nature 335, 275–277 (1988).
Strecker, T. R., Halsell, S. R., Fisher, W. W. & Lipshitz, H. D. Science 243, 1062–1066 (1989).
Desplan, C., Theis, J. & O'Farrell, P. H. Nature 318, 630–635 (1985).
Galas, D. J. & Schmitz, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 3157–3170 (1978).
Gaul, U. & Jäckle, H. Trends Genet. 3, 127–131 (1987).
Gaul, U., Seifert, E., Schuh, R. & Jäckle, H. Cell 50, 639–647 (1987).
Gaul, U. & Jäckle, H. Development, in the press.
Frasch, M. & Levine, M. Genes Dev. 1, 981–995 (1987).
Driever, W. & Nüsslein-Volhard Cell 54, 83–93 (1988).
Driever, W. & Nüsslein-Volhard Cell 54, 95–104 (1988).
Driever, W., Thoma, G. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Nature 340, 363–367 (1989).
Struhl, G., Struhl, K. & Macdonald, P. Cell 57, 1259–1273 (1989).
Schröder, C., Tautz, D., Seifert, E. & Jäckle, H. EMBO J. 7, 2881–2887 (1988).
Driever, W. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Nature 337, 138–143 (1989).
Gaul, U. & Jäckle, H. Cell 51, 549–555 (1987).
Goto, T., Macdonald, P. & Maniatis, T. Cell 57, 413–422 (1989).
Harding, K., Hoey, T., Warrior, R. & Levine, M. EMBO J. 8, 1205–1212 (1989).
Howard, K., Ingham, P. & Rushlow, C. Genes Dev. 2, 1037–1046 (1988).
Tautz, D. & Pfeifle, C. Chromosoma 98, 81–85 (1989).
Thummel, C., Boulet, A. M. & Lipshitz, H. D. Gene 74, 445–456 (1988).
Macdonald, P. M. & Struhl, G. Nature 324, 537–545 (1986).
Studier, F. W. & Moffatt, B. A. J. molec. Biol. 189, 113–130 (1986).
Rosenberg, U. et al. Nature 319, 336–339 (1986).
Kadonaga, J. T., Carner, K. R., Masiarz, F. R. & Tjian, R. Cell 51, 1079–1090 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pankratz, M., Hoch, M., Seifert, E. et al. Krüppel requirement for knirps enhancement reflects overlapping gap gene activities in the Drosophila embryo. Nature 341, 337–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/341337a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/341337a0
This article is cited by
-
Identification of the Wallenda JNKKK as an Alk suppressor reveals increased competitiveness of Alk-expressing cells
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor TLX/NR2E1 in Neural Stem Cells and Diseases
Neuroscience Bulletin (2016)
-
The gap gene network
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2011)
-
Quantitative and predictive model of transcriptional control of the Drosophila melanogaster even skipped gene
Nature Genetics (2006)
-
Transcription of a new zinc finger gene, rKr1, is localized to subtypes of neurons in the adult rat CNS
Journal of Neurocytology (1995)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.