Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Direct evidence that growth cones pull

Abstract

THERE is controversy over whether axonal elongation is the result of a pulling growth cone and the role of tension in axonal elongationl-4. Earlier in this decade, the consensus was that axons or neurites elongated from tension generated by forward motility of the growth cone5,6. It was presumed that contractile filopodia were the source of the tension moving the growth cone7,8. But this view was challenged by experiments showing that neurites elongate, albeit abnormally, in the presence of cytochalasin, which inhibits growth-cone and filopodial movements9. Additionally, high resol-ution, video-enhanced observations of growth-cone activity argued against filopodial shortening as a source of tension, suggesting instead that an extrusion of cytoplasm rather than a pulling process, is the key event in neurite elongation1,3. Studies of slow axonal transport10, however, indicate that much slower cytoskeletal pushing underlies axonal elongation. We report here direct measurements of neurite force as a function of growth-cone advance which show that they are linearly related and accompanied by apparent neurite growth. No increase in force occurs in neurites whose growth cone fails to advance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aletta, J. M. & Greene, L. A. J. Neurosci. 8, 1425–1435 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray, D. Trends Neurosci. 10, 431–434 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, D. J. & Burmeister, D. W. J. Cell Biol. 103, 1921–1931 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Letourneau, P. C., Shattuck, T. A. & Ressler, A. H. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 8, 193–209 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Landis, S. C. A. Rev. Physiol. 45, 567–580 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Letourneau, P. C. in: Neuronal Development (ed. Spitzer, N. C.) (Plenum, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bray, D. in: Cell Behavior (ed. Bellair, R., Curtis, A. & Dunn; G.) (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trinkaus, J. P. J. Neurosci. Res. 13, 1–19 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh, L. & Letourneau, P. C. J. Cell Biol. 99, 2061–2067 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lasek, R. J. J. Cell Sci. suppl. 5, 161–179 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennerll, T. J., Joshi H. C., Steel, V. L., Buxbaum, R. E. & Heidemann, S. R. J. Cell Biol. 107, 665–674 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, M. J., George, E. B. & Gilbert, L. J. Cell Motilil. 4, 351–370 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bray, D. Devl Biol. 102, 379–389 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spero, D. A. & Roisen, F. J. Devl Brain Res. 23, 155–159 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buxbaum, R. E. & Heidemann, S. R. J. theor. Biol. 134, 379–390 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray, D. & White, J. G. Science 239, 883–888 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Forscher, P. & Smith, S. J. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1505–1516 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchison, T. & Kirschner, M. Neuron 1, 761–772 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baas, P. W. & Heidemann, S. R. J. Cell Biol. 103, 917–927 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoneda, M. J. exp. Biol. 37, 461–468 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamoureux, P., Buxbaum, R. & Heidemann, S. Direct evidence that growth cones pull. Nature 340, 159–162 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/340159a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/340159a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing