A dispute over the attribution of priority for a neo-lamarckian mechanism is premature and unseemly, to say the least, and may help make science seem ridiculous.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamarck, Dr Steele and plagiarism. Nature 337, 101–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337101a0
This article is cited by
-
Mutations and plagiarisms
Nature (1989)
-
Heliocentric tangents
Nature (1989)