Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A novel level of interactions in plant–insect systems

Abstract

The importance of variation in the ability of individuals to survive or perform on different types of resource (implicit in evolutionary studies) has been discussed in both host–parasite1 and plant-insect systems2–4. But variation in host-choice behaviour and its interaction with offspring performance on variable resources5 has been studied only in insect populations that each use several plant species6,7. Here I show that in a natural population of the butterfly Euphydryas editha (Nymphalidae), some females are specialized in both oviposition behaviour and offspring performance. These specialists prefer to lay eggs on certain individuals of the host plant Pedicularis semibarbata (Scrophulariaceae) that also improve the survival of their offspring. Other E. editha females in the same population are not so specialized. They show no oviposition preference among individual P. semibarbata, and survival of their offspring is not correlated with the plant suitability categories defined by the specialists. Thus information vital to understanding the true nature of the interactions in a plant–insect system is lost when the process is described using either the average ability of an insect population to exploit a plant population or the average ability of a plant to resist attack by an insect species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. in Coevolution (eds Futuyma, D. J. & Slatkin, M.) 186–206 (Sinaur, Sunderland, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edmunds, G. F. Jr & Alstad, D. N. Science 199, 941–945 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitter, C. & Futuyma, D. J. in Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (eds Denno, R. F. & McClure, M. S.) 427–459 (Academic, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Gould, F. in Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (eds Denno, R. F. & McClure, M. S.) 599–653 (Academic, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Futuyma, D. J. & Peterson, S. A. Rev. Ent. 30, 217–238 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Via, S. Evolution 40, 778–785 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singer, M. C., Ng, D. & Thomas, C. D. Evolution 42, (in the press).

  8. Rausher, M. D., Mackay, D. A. & Singer, M. C. Anim. Behav. 29, 1220–1228 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makay, D. A. Ecol. 66, 142–151 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer, M. C. in Insect-Plant Interactions (eds Miller, J. R. & Miller, T. A.) 65–94 (Springer, New York, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng, D. Dissertation, Univ. Texas (1987).

  12. Moore, S. D. Dissertation, Univ. Texas (1987).

  13. Rausher, M. D. & Papaj, D. R. Ecology 64, 1402–1410 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Myers, J. H. J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 193–204 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrow, P. S. & LaMarche, V. C. Science 201, 1244–1246 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marquis, R. J. Science 226, 537–539 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Futuyma, D. J. in Coevolution (eds Futuyma, D. J. & Slatkin, M.) 207–231 (Sinaur, Sunderland, 1083).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R. & Nitao, J. K. Evolution 40, 1215–1228 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scriber, J. M. in Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems (eds Denno, R. F. & McClure, M. S.) 373–412 (Academic, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Janzen, D. H. in Herbivores: Their Interactions With Secondary Plant Metabolites (eds Rosenthal, G. A. & Janzen, D. H.) 331–350 (Academic, London, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ng, D. A novel level of interactions in plant–insect systems. Nature 334, 611–613 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/334611a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/334611a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing