Abstract
The observed galaxy distribution is almost our sole source of information about the distribution of matter on very large scales. Most efforts to estimate the mean density of the Universe from the dynamical behaviour of observed inhomogeneities assume the galaxy distribution to trace that of the mass1–4. If galaxies are assumed to be a statistically fair sample from the overall mass distribution, the Universe must be open, but if galaxies are systematically overrepresented in high density regions then the observational data may be compatible with a closed or flat universe5,6. There are many reasons to suspect that the galaxy distribution may indeed be biassed in this way with respect to the mass7–10, and, with a particular model for the biasing, a flat universe dominated by cold dark matter (CDM) provides a remarkably good description of observed structure6,11,12. Here we show that the gravitational growth of structure by hierarchical clustering leads automatically to a bias in the distribution of galaxies. The strength of this bias is such that if the Universe does indeed conform to the CDM model then its density must approach the closure value. The mechanism predicts a significant dependence of the strength of galaxy clustering on the depth of the potential well of the galaxies considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. Davis, M. & Peebles, P. J. E. Astrophys. J. 267, 465-482 (1983). 2. Bean, A. J., Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., Peterson, B. A. & Shanks, T. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 205, 605-624 (1983). 3. Yahil, A., Walker, D. & Rowan-Robinson, M. Astrophys. J. 301, L1-L5 (1986). 4. Meiksin, A. & Davis, M. Astr. J. 91, 191-198 (1986). 5. Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N. & Szalay, A. S. Astrophys. J. 304, 15-61 (1986). 6. Davis, M., Efstathiou, G., Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. Astrophys. J. 292, 371-394 (1985). 7. Rees, M. J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 213, 75p-81p (1985). 8. Rees, M. J. in Clusters and Groups of Galaxies: Astrophys. Sp. Sci. Library, vol. Ill (eds Mardirossian, F., Giuricin, G. & Mezzeti, M.) 485-497, (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984). 9. Dekel, A. & Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 303, 39-55 (1986). 10. Dekel, A. & Rees, M. J. Nature, 326, 455-462 (1987). 11. Blumenthal, G. R., Faber, S. M., Primack, J. R. & Rees, M. J. Nature 311, 517-525 (1984). 12. White, S. D. M., Frenk, C. S., Davis, M. & Efstathiou, G. Astrophys. J. 313, 505-516 (1987). 13. Peebles, P. J. E. The Large Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, 1980). 14. White, S. D. M. & Rees, M. J. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 183, 341-358 (1978). 15. Silk, J. Astrophys. J. 211, 638-648 (1977). 16. Rees, M. J. & Ostriker, J Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 179, 541-552 (1977). 17. Fall, S. M. & Efstathiou, G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 193, 189-206 (1980). 18. Toomre, A. in Evolution of Galaxies and Stellar Populations (eds Tinsley, B. M. & Larson, R. B.) 401-426 (Yale University Press, 1977). 19. Fall, S. M. Nature 281, 200-202 (1979). 20. Peebles, P. J. E. Astrophys. J. 263, L1-L5 (1982). 21. Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Efstathiou, G. & Davis, M. Nature 317, 595-597 (1985). 22. Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Davis, M. & Efstathiou, G. Astrophys. J. (in the press). 23. Efstathiou, G., Davis, M. Frenk, C. S. & White, S. D. M. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 57, 241-260 (1985). 24. Hockney, R. W. & Eastwood, J. W. Computer Simulations Using Particles (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981). 25. Huchra, J. P. in Proc. European Southern Observatory Workshop on the Virgo Cluster (eds Richter, O.-G. & Binggeli, B.) 181-200 (ESO Publications, Garching, 1984). 26. Tully, R. B. & Fisher, J. R. Astr. Astrophys. 54, 661-673 (1977). 27. Aaronson, M. & Mould, J. Astrophys. J. 265, 1-17 (1983). 28. Faber, S. M. & Jackson, R. E. Astrophys. J. 204, 668-683 (1976). 29. Davies, R. L., Efstathiou, G., Fall, S. M., Illingworth, G. & Schechter, P. L. Astrophys. J. 266,41-57 (1983). 30. Davis M. & Geller, M. J. Astrophys. J. 208, 13-19 (1976). 31. Giovanelli, R., Haynes, M. P. & Chincarini, G. L. Astrophvs. J. 300, 77-92 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, S., Davist, M., Efstathioui, G. et al. Galaxy distribution in a cold dark matter universe. Nature 330, 451–453 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/330451a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/330451a0
This article is cited by
-
Hosts and environments: a (large-scale) radio history of AGN and star-forming galaxies
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2022)
-
Environmental Dependence of All the Five Band Luminosities of Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) Host Galaxies
Astrophysics (2021)
-
Comparisons of the galaxy age, stellar velocity dispersion and K-band luminosity distributions between grouped galaxies and isolated ones
Astrophysics and Space Science (2016)
-
Dependence of galaxy clustering on K-band luminosity
Astrophysics and Space Science (2015)
-
Shedding light on the galaxy luminosity function
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2011)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
