Letter | Published:

Changes in abundance or structure of the per gene product can alter periodicity of the Drosophila clock

Nature volume 326, pages 390392 (26 March 1987) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The period (per) locus, which controls biological rhythms in Drosophila, was originally defined by three chemically induced mutations1. Flies carrying the per° mutation were arrhythmic, whereas pers and perl mutants had circadian behavioural rhythms with 19-hour and 29-hour periodicities, respectively1. Wild-type flies have 24-hour rhythms. Here we compare the per locus DNA sequences of the three mutants with the parental wild-type. The pers and perl mutations lead to amino-acid substitutions, whereas per° introduces an early translation stop (amber). The results indicate that the protein product of per controls biological rhythms. We also report that the abundance of this protein may set the pace of the Drosophila clock. Although circadian rhythms are restored when arrhythmic (per) Drosophila are transformed with per locus DNA, flies receiving identical transforming DNA segments can produce rhythms with periods that differ by more than 12 hours. Transcription studies reveal a tenfold variation in the level of per RNA among transformed lines. Levels of per RNA are inversely correlated with period length, so that flies with lowest levels of the per product have slow-running biological clocks. On the basis of the combined studies we suggest that perl and pers mutants produce hypoactive and hyperactive per proteins, respectively.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 2112–2116 (1971).

  2. 2.

    & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 2142–2146 (1984).

  3. 3.

    et al. Cell 38, 701–710 (1984).

  4. 4.

    , , & Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 50, 865–875 (1985).

  5. 5.

    , , & Nature 320, 185–188 (1986).

  6. 6.

    , & Nature 312, 752–754 (1984).

  7. 7.

    & Molec. gen. Genet. 183, 243–251 (1981).

  8. 8.

    & Molec. gen. Genet. 185, 30–36 (1982).

  9. 9.

    & J. theor. Biol. 121, 487–503 (1986).

  10. 10.

    & Cell 34, 47–57 (1983).

  11. 11.

    , & Cell 34, 59–73 (1983).

  12. 12.

    Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 40, 1018–1029 (1954).

  13. 13.

    in Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology Vol. 4 (ed. Aschoff, J.) 95–124 (Plenum, New York, 1981).

  14. 14.

    et al. Cell 39, 369–376 (1984).

  15. 15.

    et al. J. Neurogenet. 3, 249–291 (1986).

  16. 16.

    & Genetics 88, 723–742 (1978).

  17. 17.

    , , & Cell 33, 115–123 (1983).

  18. 18.

    , & Plasmid 13, 31–40 (1985).

  19. 19.

    , , , & J. molec. Biol. 143, 161–178 (1980).

  20. 20.

    , & Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 3963–3965 (1983).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Nature 317, 445–448 (1985).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Cell 46, 53–61 (1986).

  23. 23.

    et al. Nature 326, 42–47 (1987).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    • F. Rob Jackson

    Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, Shrewsbury, Massachusetts 0154, USA

Affiliations

  1. The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA

    • Mary Kilar Baylies
    • , Thaddeus A. Bargiello
    • , F. Rob Jackson
    •  & Michael W. Young

Authors

  1. Search for Mary Kilar Baylies in:

  2. Search for Thaddeus A. Bargiello in:

  3. Search for F. Rob Jackson in:

  4. Search for Michael W. Young in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/326390a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.