Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetics and evolution of female choice

Abstract

Fisher's theory of the evolution of sexual selection by female choice depends crucially on the premise that the preference of females to mate with males of a specific genotype is itself genetic1. In the polymorphic ladybird Adalia bipunctata, a genetically determined, non-assortative female preference for melanic males has been demonstrated2. Models of the evolution of female choice show that the rate of evolution and the final outcome of this selection depend critically on the exact mode of inheritance of both the preferred character and the preference3. Here we describe experiments in which the level of preference has been raised by artificial selection over 14 generations. Resultant estimates of heritability are consistent with models in which one or a small number of genes control the preference. Analysis of the levels of preference in isofemale lines derived from the high preference stock shows a quadrimodal distribution in preference. These results are entirely consistent with the deduction that a single dominant gene controls female choice. We conclude that this complex behavioural strategy is based on simple genetics. Furthermore, the demonstration of a simple genetic basis to female mating preferences in A. bipunctata implies that sexual selection by female choice is not only important in the evolution of male sexual adornments in sexually dimorphic species, but may also maintain polymorphisms that are not sex-limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Majerus, M. E. N., O'Donald, P. & Weir, J. Nature 300, 521–523 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Donald, P. Heredity 22, 499–578 (1967). Genetic Models of Sexual Selection (Cambridge University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Majerus, M. E. N., O'Donald, P. & Weir, J. Heredity 49, 37–49 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkpatrick, M. Evolution 36, 1–12 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Donald, P., Derrick, M., Majerus, M. E. N. & Weir, J. Heredity 52, 43–61 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheppard, P. M. Heredity 6, 239–241 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooke, F. & Cooch, F. G. Evolution 22, 289–300 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooke, F., Mirsky, P. J. & Seiger, M. B. Can. J. Zool. 50, 529–536 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Donald, P. The Arctic Skua (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Eanes, W. F., Gaffney, P. M., Koehn, R. K. & Simon, C. M. Lect. Notes Biomath. 19, 49–64 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maynard-Smith, J. Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewontin, R. C. Nature 266, 283–284 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Donald, P. & Majerus, M. E. N. Heredity 55, 401–412 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majerus, M., O'Donald, P., Kearns, P. et al. Genetics and evolution of female choice. Nature 321, 164–167 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/321164a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/321164a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing