Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Investigating the paranormal

Parascience has so far failed to produce a single repeatable finding and, until it does, will continue to be viewed as an incoherent collection of belief systems steeped in fantasy, illusion and error.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kurtz, P. Skeptical Inquirer. 3, 14–32 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diaconis, P. Science. 201, 131–136 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansel, C. E. M. ESP and Parapsychology: A Critical ReevaluationH (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marks, D. & Kammann, R. The Psychology of the Psychic (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alcock, J. E. Parapsychology: Science of Magic? (Pergamon, Oxford, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frazier, K. (ed.). Paranormal Borderlands of Science (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1981).

  7. Gardner, M. Science Good Bad and Bogus (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Randi, J. Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kurtz, P. Skeptical Inquirer. 8, 239–246 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frazier, K. (ed.) Science Confronts the Paranormal (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1985).

  11. Kurtz, P. (ed.) A Skeptics Handbook of Parapsychology (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1985).

  12. Bunge, M. Skeptical Inquirer. 9, 36–46 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tiller, W. A. New Scient. 62, 160–163 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pehek, J. O., Kyler, H. J. & Faust, D. L. Science. 194, 263–270 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Houdini Miracle Mongers and Their Methods (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leikind, B. J. & McCarthy, W. J. Skeptical Inquirer. 10, 23–34 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vogt, E. H. & Hyman, R. Waterwitching USA 2nd edn (Chicago University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Randi, J. Skeptical Inquirer. 8, 329–333 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, M. Skeptical Inquirer. 8, 138–140 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Randi, J. The Magic of Uri Geller (Ballantine, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fuller, U. Confessions of a Psychic (Karl Fulves, Box 433, Teaneck, New Jersey, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fuller, U., Confessions of a Psychic (Karl Fulves, New Jersey, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marks, D. & Kammann, R. Zetetic. 1 (2), 9–17 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hyman, R. Zetetic. 1 (2), 18–37 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soal, S. G. & Goldney, K. M. Proc. Soc. psychical Res. 47, 21–150 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scott, C. & Haskell, P. Nature. 245, 52–54 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marwick, B. Proc. Soc. psychical Res. 56, 250–281 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoebens, P. H. Skeptical Inquirer. 6, 32–40 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Mille, R. Castandeda's Journey 2nd ed (Capra, Santa Barbara, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Skinner, B. F. Science and Human Behavior (Macmillan, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bunge, M. Method, Model and Matter (Reidel, Dordrecht,1973).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmeidler, G. R. & McConnell, R. A. ESP and Personality Patterns (Yale University Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor, J. Superminds: An Inquiry into the Paranormal (Macmillan, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barratt, W. Proc. Soc. psychical Res. 34, 275–297 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rhine, J. B. The Reach of Mind, 209–214 (Sloane, New York,1947).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tart, C. T., Scientific Studies of the Psychic Realm, vii–viii (Dutton, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Flew, A. in Science,Pseudo-Science and Society (eds Hanen,M. P., Osier, M. J. & Weyant, R. G.) 55–75 (Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cooper, D. E. in Philosophy and Psychical Research (ed. Thakur, S. C.) 59–80 (Allen & Unwin, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Scriven, M. in Philosophy and Psychical Research (ed. Thakur, S. C.) 181–194 (Allen & Unwin, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wolman, B. J. (ed.) Handbook of Parapsychology (Van Nostrand, New York, 1977).

  42. Beloff, J. Zetetic Scholar. 6, 90–94 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morris, R. L. J. Am. Soc. psychical Res. 74, 425–443 (1980).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Akers, C. in Advances in Parapsychological Research Vol. 4 (ed. Krippner, S.) 112–164 (McFarland, Jefferson, North Carolina, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hyman, R. J. Parapsychol. 49, 3–49 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Targ, R. & Puthoff, H. E. Nature 252, 602–607 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Marks, D. F. & Kammann, R. Nature 274, 680–681 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hyman, R. Skeptical Inquirer 9, 125–145 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tart, C. T., Puthoff, H. E. & Targ, R. Nature 284, 191 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Marks, D. F. Skeptical Inquirer 6, 18–29 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  51. O'Keefe, D. Stolen Lightning (Robertson, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wilson, S. C. & Barber, T. X. in Imagery: Current Theory, Research and Application (ed. Sheikh, A. A. ) 340–387 (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marks, D. & McKellar, P. J. mental imagery 6, 1–124 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gurney, E. & Myers, F. W. H. Proc. Soc. psychical Res. 5, 403–485 (1889).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sidgwick, H. Proc. Soc. psychical Res. 10, 25–422 (1894).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Finucane, R. C. Appearances of the Dead (Prometheus, Buffalo, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zusne, L. & Jones, W. H. Anomalistic Psychology (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Edwards, W. in Formal Representation of Human Judgement (ed. Kleinmuntz, B.) 17–52 (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hoebens, P. H. Skeptical Inquirer 1, 38–45 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Klass, P. J. Zetetic 2, 57–61 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Koestler, A. The Roots of Coincidence (Hutchinson, London, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rhine, L. E. J. Parapsychol. 15, 164–190 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tart, C. T. Learning to Use Extrasensory Perception (University of Chicago Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tart, C. T., Palmer, J. & Redington, D. J. J. Am. Soc. psychical Res. 73, 151–165 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Dixon, N. F. Preconscious Processing (Wiley, Chichester, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fransella, F. & Bannister, D. A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique (Academic, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Windholz, G. & Diamant, L. Bull, psychon.Sci. 3, 125–126 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marks, D. Investigating the paranormal. Nature 320, 119–124 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/320119a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/320119a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing