Letter | Published:

Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour

Nature volume 318, pages 366367 (28 November 1985) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

There are two ways to model the genetic evolution of social behaviour. Population genetic models using personal fitness1 –9 may be exact and of wide applicability, but they are often complex and assume very different forms for different kinds of social behaviour. The alternative, inclusive fitness models10 –12, achieves simplicity and clarity by attributing all fitness effects of a behaviour to an expanded fitness of the actor. For example, Hamilton's rule states that an altruistic behaviour will be favoured when −c + rb>0, where c is the fitness cost to the altruist, b is the benefit to its partner, and r is their relatedness. But inclusive fitness results are often inexact for interactions between kin1–5, and they do not address phenomena such as reciprocity13–15 and synergistic effects7,8,16 that may either be confounded with kinship or operate in its absence. Here I develop a model the results of which may be expressed in terms of either personal or inclusive fitness, and which combines the advantages of both; it is general, exact, simple and empirically useful. Hamilton's rule is shown to hold for reciprocity as well as kin selection. It fails because of synergistic effects, but this failure can be corrected through the use of coefficients of synergism, which are analogous to the coefficient of relatedness.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The Genetics of Altruism (Academic, New York, 1980).

  2. 2.

    J. theor. Biol. 72, 297–319 (1978).

  3. 3.

    Am. Nat. 114, 515–524 (1979).

  4. 4.

    & Theor. popul. Biol. 14, 268–280 (1978).

  5. 5.

    & Am. Nat. 120, 614–627 (1982).

  6. 6.

    Am. Nat. 125, 61–73 (1985).

  7. 7.

    & Theor. popul. Biol. 9, 360–387 (1976).

  8. 8.

    & Theor. popul Biol. 10, 276–302 (1976).

  9. 9.

    The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1980).

  10. 10.

    J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964).

  11. 11.

    J. theor. Biol. 91, 191–213 (1981).

  12. 12.

    A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 13, 23–55 (1982).

  13. 13.

    Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).

  14. 14.

    & Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981).

  15. 15.

    , & J. theor. Biol. 99, 319–339 (1982).

  16. 16.

    in Current Problems in Sociobiology (eds. King's College Sociobiology Group) 29–44 (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

  17. 17.

    Nature 227, 520–521 (1970).

  18. 18.

    & J. theor. Biol. 73, 679–686 (1978).

  19. 19.

    & Nature 288, 694–697 (1980).

  20. 20.

    Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23, 133–143 (1984).

  21. 21.

    Theor. popul. Biol. 18, 151–159 (1980).

  22. 22.

    , , & Am. Nat. 119, 710–719 (1982).

  23. 23.

    , & Nature 282, 839–841 (1979).

  24. 24.

    Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 2nd ed (Longman, London1981).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Rice University, PO Box 1892, Houston, Texas 77251, USA

    • David C. Queller

Authors

  1. Search for David C. Queller in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/318366a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.