Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Relations of the new phylum Cycliophora

Abstract

The Cycliophora is the most recently described animal phylum and is based on a single species, Symbion pandora, which was discovered on the mouthparts of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus1. Because only a few morphological data1,2,3 are available for Symbion, the precise nature of its phylogenetic relationships is highly controversial2,4,5. Here we present a phylogenetic analysis of 18S ribosomal RNA sequence data, including a new Symbion sequence, which places Symbion in a lophophorate-aschelminth-protostome clade and which suggests a sister-group relationship between Cycliophora and a Rotifera-Acanthocephala clade.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Strict consensus tree, showing groups present in all trees obtained by four different tree-construction methods applied to an 18S rRNA data set6 that includes the S. pandora and N. norvegicus data.

References

  1. Funch, P. & Kristensen, R. M. Nature 378, 711–714 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Funch, P. & Kristensen, R.M. in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates 13: Lophophorates, Entoprocta and Cycliophora (eds Harrison, F.W. & Woollacott, R.M.) 409-474 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1997).

  3. Funch, P. J. Morphol. 230, 231–263 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conway Morris, S. Nature 378, 661–662 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. d'Hondt, J.-L. Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon 66, 12–22 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van de Peer, Y., Caers, A., De Rijk, P. & De Wachter, R. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 179–182 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 1.0: Manual (Pennsylvania State Univ., Pennsylvania, 1993).

  8. Bremer, K. Evolution 42, 795–803 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lorenzen, S. in The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates (eds Conway Morris, S., George, J. D., Gibson, R. & Platt, H. M.) 210-223 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1985).

  10. Garey, J. R., Near, T. J., Nonnemacher, M. R. & Nadler, S. A. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 287–292 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlrichs, W. H. Zoomorphology 117, 41–48 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1990).

  13. Kimura, M. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. in Mammalian Protein Metabolism (ed. Munro, H. N.) 21-132 (Academic, New York, 1969).

  15. Van de Peer, Y., Van der Auwera, G. & De Wachter, R. J. Mol. Evol. 42, 201–210 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winnepenninckx, B., Backeljau, T. & Kristensen, R. Relations of the new phylum Cycliophora. Nature 393, 636–638 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/31377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/31377

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing