Introduction

Genitourinary complications are frequent among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).1 Incidence of urinary calculi in SCI varies from 2.3 to 9.5% depending on duration of injury.2 Residual urine, urinary tract infection (UTI) and chronic indwelling catheter are important predisposing factors for calculi formation. In the genitourinary tract, the urethra is the least common location for calculi. Overall, the incidence of urethral calculi among urolithiasis is only 1%.3 Urethral calculi result in pain, dysuria, haematuria and urinary retention. However, sensory deficits in SCI may modify these clinical manifestations. This communication reports a subject with tetraplegia who had difficulty in negotiating the catheter during intermittent self-catheterization following impaction of a calculus in penile urethra.

Case report

A 25-year-old man with tetraplegia following a road traffic accident underwent operative reduction and fixation of spine. He was admitted for rehabilitation 14 months after the injury. He had persistent loss of all sensory and motor function (ASIA-A)4 below C6 level with retention of urine. He had an indwelling urethral catheter for 1 year. His urine culture showed significant bacteriuria with Proteus mirabilis and Escheria coli. Both organisms were sensitive to amikacin. The urinary tract infection was treated and urine microscopy and culture done after 7 days of amikacin were normal. His cystometrogram with simultaneous sphincter EMG showed detrusor hyperreflexia with nonrelaxing sphincters. He was started on clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) and oxybutinin 5 mg three times a day. Ultrasound examination of the kidney and bladder were not done at this point. We did not attempt to manipulate urinary pH or start antibiotics as prophylaxis against UTI.

After 2 months, he presented with inability to pass his catheter and painless retention of urine. He did not have dysuria, haematuria or suprapubic pain. On palpation, an oval solid mass was detected at the level of the glans penis. An impacted urethral calculus was suspected. X-ray of the genital region revealed an oval calculus of 2 cm × 3 cm in size in fossa navicularis of the penile urethra (Figure 1). Ultrasound examination of kidneys, ureters and bladder was normal. Urinary microscopy showed pus cells and culture revealed significant bacteriuria because of P. mirabilis, sensitive to amikacin. The calculus was crushed transurethrally and removed. The UTI was treated with amikacin. He was able to perform CISC after the procedure.

Figure 1
figure 1

X-ray showing ovoid calculus impacted in the fossa naviculasis of penile urethra

Discussion

Urinary calculi is often a late complication of SCI. Its incidence increases with duration after injury.2 Although calculi have also been reported in patients performing clean intermittent catheterization,5 the incidence was significantly reduced.6 As many as 98% of SCI patients with calculi had evidence of UTI, particularly with urea splitting organisms like Proteus.5 Our subject also had UTI because of P. mirabilis. Prompt treatment of UTI, especially those involving Proteus, may help to reduce urolothiasis among subjects with SCI. Manipulation of urinary pH and prophylaxis with antibiotics are other measures that will help to reduce UTI and stone formation in this population. Early cystoscopy to rule out urolithiasis may be considered in patients with SCI and recurrent UTI.

Urethral calculi are rare in Western countries but are common in developing countries.3 These calculi may become lodged at various levels in the urethra such as prostatic part, perineal part, fossa navicularis and external meatus. In our subject, the site of impaction was the fossa navicularis. Urethral calculi are frequently secondary to expelled vesical calculi. Primary urethral calculi are associated with urethral stricture or diverticulum.3 In this subject, ultrasound examination did not show calculi at any other part of the genitourinary tract and there was no obstruction of urethra after removal of the calculus. Thus, the exact site of origin of calculus in this patient is not certain.

Expulsion of urinary calculi through the urethra results in severe pain and only small calculi are expelled spontaneously. SCI patients may have loss of sensation, patulous Urethra and destrusor hyperreflexia enabling even large calculi to be expelled spontaneously.7 Our patient did not have any pain and his only symptoms were difficulty in negotiating his catheter and painless retention of urine. Symptomatic calculi that fail to expel spontaneously require management by methods such as flush back treatment and retrograde manipulation, ultrasonic fragmentation and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy or by surgical methods.8 Our patient was managed nonoperatively by intraurethral crushing and removal of calculus.

Conclusion

While urolithisasis is frequent among subjects with SCI, urethral calculi are rare. Our subject presented with difficulty in negotiating his urethral catheter during CISC and acute painless retention of urine because of impaction of calculus in penile urethra. Associated neurological deficits like absence of pain alters clinical features of urethral calculi in SCI. A high index of suspicion and periodic monitoring of genitourinary tract by imaging are necessary for early detection and prompt treatment to prevent complications.