Abstract
The case histories of two patients who had had a spinal cord injury (SCI) were selected by the senior author and sent to four experts in the field of SCI. Based on the 1992 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) and International Medical Society of Paraplegia (IMSOP) standards, the four participants plus the senior author recorded the motor and sensory scores, the ASIA impairment scale (AIS), the neurological level (NL) and the zone of partial preservation (ZPP). Several minor scoring errors occurred among the participants, especially with motor scores when key muscles could not be tested due to pain, or external immobilization devices. Difficulties with interpretation occurred with the motor levels and the ZPP for the patient with a complete injury. This exercise points to the need for all examiners of SCI patients to thoroughly familiarize themselves with the standards and to use the motor and sensory scores to arrive at a NL and ZPP. They also indicate a need to revise the standards to clarify the determination of sensory levels and how to score muscles whose strength is inhibited by pain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donovan, W., Brown, D., Jr, J. et al. Neurological issues. Spinal Cord 35, 275–281 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100449
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100449
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord (2017)
-
Electrophysiological Analysis of Transmission Via Spinal Pathways After Vertebral Trauma
Neurophysiology (2009)
-
Inter-rater reliability of motor and sensory examinations performed according to American Spinal Injury Association standards
Spinal Cord (2007)
-
Towards improved clinical and physiological assessments of recovery in spinal cord injury: a clinical initiative
Spinal Cord (2004)