Is stepwise sarcomere shortening an artefact?—a response

Abstract

Like any other signals, optical signals from muscle fibres inevitably contain noise. The noise here is of predictable character. Because the structure of muscle is periodic, or almost so, translational movement of an illuminated fibre will inevitably give rise to a periodic noise fluctuation as striations pass across the optical field. The frequency of this fluctuation should be linearly related to the speed at which the fibre translates. By mistaking this noise component for the signal, Altringham and colleagues1 have amply succeeded in confirming this expected relationship, but they have left unanswered the question of the source and nature of stepwise shortening. I show here that: (1) by having obtained records in conditions in which the noise dominated, Altringham et al. have inadvertently confused the steps with the translation-induced fluctuation; and (2) when records are obtained using a method designed specifically to circumvent the effects of translation, the steps still remain in evidence.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Altringham, J. D., Bottinelli, R. & Lacktis, J. W. Nature 307, 653–655 (1984).

  2. 2

    Pollack, G. H., Iwazumi, T., ter Keurs, H. E. D. J. & Shibata, E. F. Nature 268,757–759 (1977).

  3. 3

    Pollack, G. H., Vassallo, D. V., Jacobson, R. C., Iwazumi, T. & Delay, M. J. in Cross-bridge Mechanism in Muscle Contraction (eds Sugi, H. & Pollack, G. H.) 23–40 (University of Tokyo Press, 1979).

  4. 4

    Jacobson, R. C., Tirosh, R., Delay, M. J. & Pollack, G. H. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motility 4, 529–542 (1983).

  5. 5

    Myers, J., Tirosh, R., Jacobson, R. C. & Pollack, G. H. IEEE Trans, biomed. Engng 29, 463–466 (1982).

  6. 6

    Granzier, H. L. M., Brozovich, F. V., Rowinski, S., Myers, J. & Pollack, G. H. Biophys. J. 42 (in the press).

  7. 7

    Gordon, A. M., Huxley, A. F. & Julian, F. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 184, 143–169 (1966).

  8. 8

    Edman, P., Elzinga, G. & Noble, M. I. M. J. gen. Physiol. 80, 769–784 (1982).

  9. 9

    Housmans, P. R. in Contractile Mechanisms in Muscle (eds Pollack, G. H. & Sugi, H.) 782–784 (Plenum, New York, 1984).

  10. 10

    Rüdel, R. & Zite-Ferenczy, F. Nature 278, 573–575 (1979).

  11. 11

    Morgan, D. L. Biophys. J. 21, 89a (1978).

  12. 12

    Goldman, Y. E. Biophys. J. 41, 251a (1983).

  13. 13

    Roos, K. P., Baskin, R. J., Lieber, R. L., Cline, J. W. & Paolini, P. J. Rev. sci. Instrum. 51, 762–767 (1980).

  14. 14

    Delay, M. J., Ishide, N., Jacobson, R. C., Pollack, G. H. & Tirosh, R. Science 213,1523–1525 (1981).

  15. 15

    Brozovich, F. V., Granzier, H. L. M. & Pollack, G. H. (in preparation).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollack, G. Is stepwise sarcomere shortening an artefact?—a response. Nature 309, 712–713 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/309712a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.