Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer


That female vertebrates who are able to invest more than average in their offspring should produce male-biased sex ratios was first suggested by Trivers and Willard1 who reasoned that the breeding success of males is more variable than that of females and so may be more strongly influenced by parental investment. Their evidence for a positive association between maternal condition and birth sex ratios was unconvincing2,3 and no subsequent studies have produced conclusive evidence supporting their hypothesis4,8. We show here that, in polygynous red deer (Cervus elaphus), dominant mothers produce significantly more sons than subordinates and that maternal rank has a greater effect on the breeding success of males than females.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. E. Science 179, 90–92 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Myers, J. H. Am. Nat. 112, 381–388 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Williams, G. C. Proc. R. Soc. B205, 567–580 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Clutton-Brock, T. H. Nature 298, 11–13 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S. D. in Current Problems in Sociobiology (ed. King's College Sociobiology Group) (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Altmann, J. Baboon Mothers and Infants (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Simpson, M. J. & Simpson, A. E. Nature 300, 440–441 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Silk, J. B. Am. Nat. 121, 56–66 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E. & Albon, S. D. Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes (University of Chicago Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Gibson, R. M. & Guinness, F. E. Anim. Behav. 27, 211–225 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Nature 300, 178–180 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Ryder, M. L. J. Zool. 181, 137–143 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Mitchell, B. & Lincoln, G. A. J. Zool. 171, 141–152 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Small, M. F. Int. J. Primatol. 2, 91–95 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Nature 289, 487–487 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Clutton-Brock, T. H. in Evolution from Molecules to Men (ed. Bendall, D. S.) (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Suttie, J. M. Anim. Behav. 31, 610–611 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Charnov, E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Verme, L. J. J. Wildl. Mgmt 33, 881–887 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Verme, L. J. & Ozoga, J. J. J. Wildl. Mgmt 45, 710–715 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    McCullough, D. R. The George Reserve Deer Herd (University of Michigan Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Geist, V. Mountain Sheep (University of Chicago Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Bygott, D. thesis, Univ. Cambridge (1974).

  24. 24

    Novikoshi, K. & Koyama, N. in Symp. of the 5th Congr. of Int. Primatological Soc. (eds Konde, S., Kawai, M., Ehara, A. & Kawamura, S.) 43–61 (Japan Science, Tokyo, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Packer, C. thesis. Univ. Sussex (1977).

  26. 26

    Dewsbury, D. A. Q. Rev. Biol. 57, 135–159 (1982).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Kawai, M. Primates 14, 113–159 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Missakiah, E. Primates 13, 169–180 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Hausfater, G., Altmann, J. & Altmann, A. Science 217, 752–755 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Dunbar, R. I. M. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 253–265 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Greenwood, P. & Powell, R. P. Z. Tierpsychol. 41, 202–216 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Kermack, K. A. & Haldane, J. B. S. Biometrika 37, 30–41 (1950).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clutton-Brock, T., Albon, S. & Guinness, F. Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308, 358–360 (1984).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing