Letter | Published:

Polarimetry of the millisecond pulsar

Naturevolume 302pages690692 (1983) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The millisecond pulsar1 PSR1937 + 21 might be expected to have unique waveform and polarization properties as a result of its remarkably short period and small spin-down rate2,3. The proximity of the velocity of light cylinder to the star (RLC = 7.4 × 106 cm) and the low value of inferred magnetic field (108 G, 10−4 that of the Crab pulsar) should strongly influence the magnetospheric structure and particle density of this pulsar. And yet the waveform is similar to that of the Crab pulsar4 and PSR1055 − 52 (ref. 5), which have interpulses that are comparable in strength to the main pulse, and the polarization properties are at first sight unexceptional2. I present here polarization observations of the main pulse and interpulse at 1,415 and 2,380 MHz that have higher time resolution than previously available. The main pulse depolarizes substantially over this frequency range whereas the interpulse polarization almost doubles. There is evidence that orthogonally polarized radiation is present on the leading edge of the main pulse and the trailing edge of the interpulse and that it accounts for the 90° difference in position angle between the main pulse and interpulse. The interpulse decreases in intensity relative to the main pulse as f−1, indicating (if the trend continues to lower frequency) that the high frequency interpulse dominates the main pulse below 700 MHz. The main pulse is found to consist of two closely spaced components.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Backer, D. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Heiles, C., Davis, M. M. & Goss, W. M. Nature 300, 615–618 (1982).

  2. 2

    Ashworth, M., Lyne, A. G. & Smith, F. G. Nature 301, 313–314 (1983).

  3. 3

    Backer, D. C., Kulkarni, S. R. & Taylor, J. H. Nature 301, 314–315 (1983).

  4. 4

    Manchester, R. N. Astrophys. J. Lett. 163, L61–L63 (1971).

  5. 5

    McCulloch, P. M., Hamilton, P. A., Ables, J. G. & Komesaroff, M. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 175, 71P–75P (1976).

  6. 6

    Stinebring, D. R., Cordes, J. M., Rankin, J. M., Weisberg, J. M. & Boriakoff, V. Astrophys. J. (submitted,).

  7. 7

    Manchester, R. N. & Lyne, A.G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 181, 761–767 (1977).

  8. 8

    Cheng, A. F. & Ruderman, M. A. Astrophys. J. 216, 865–872 (1977).

  9. 9

    Hankins, T. H. & Cordes, J. M. Astrophys. J. 249, 241–253 (1981).

  10. 10

    Narayan, R. & Vivekanand, M. Nature (submitted).

  11. 11

    Rankin, J. M. et al. Astrophys. J. 162, 707–725 (1970).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901, USA

    • Daniel R. Stinebring

Authors

  1. Search for Daniel R. Stinebring in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/302690a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.