Letter | Published:

Developmental stability and enzyme heterozygosity in rainbow trout

Nature volume 301, pages 7172 (06 January 1983) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The developmental pathways of organisms are genetically adjusted to produce the characteristic morphology of the species regardless of variations in internal and external conditions during development. This ‘developmental buffering’, however, is not always precise. Bilateral characters of an organism are often asymmetric, that is, different in size, shape or number. Fluctuating asymmetry occurs when the difference between a character on the left and right sides of individuals is normally distributed about a mean of zero1. This type of asymmetry results from the inability of an organism to develop precisely along determined paths1,2 and can be used as a measure of developmental stability1,3–5. Increased developmental stability would be reflected by reduced amounts of fluctuating asymmetry. We have now examined the relationship between the amount of fluctuating asymmetry for five bilateral characters and heterozygosity at 13 polymorphic loci in a population of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Our results indicate a significant negative correlation between the proportion of heterozygous loci and the proportion of asymmetric characters. These data provide evidence that individuals with greater heterozygosity within a population have increased developmental stability.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Evolution 16, 125–142 (1962).

  2. 2.

    , & Evolution 21, 85–91 (1967).

  3. 3.

    Heredity 12, 401–415 (1958).

  4. 4.

    Am. Nat. 101, 141–160 (1967).

  5. 5.

    Copeia 1980, 18–29 (1980).

  6. 6.

    Genetic Homeostasis (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1954).

  7. 7.

    & Nature 170, 286 (1952).

  8. 8.

    Evolution 33, 396–401 (1979).

  9. 9.

    Am. Nat. 119, 824–832 (1982).

  10. 10.

    & Evolution 36, 768–776 (1982).

  11. 11.

    Nature 273, 661–662 (1978).

  12. 12.

    Nature 276, 263–264 (1978).

  13. 13.

    , , & Hereditas 86, 179–190 (1977).

  14. 14.

    & Ecol. Bull. 34, 37–52 (1981).

  15. 15.

    Animal Cytogenetics 4 (Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1974).

  16. 16.

    , , & J. biol. Chem. 245, 5927–5940 (1970).

  17. 17.

    in Physiological Genetics (ed. Scandalios, J. G.) 1–61 (Academic, New York, 1979).

  18. 18.

    , & Genetics 102, 259–268 (1982).

  19. 19.

    & Biometry, 427–428 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1981).

  20. 20.

    Syst. Zool. 10, 105–117 (1961).

  21. 21.

    J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23, 1537–1551 (1966).

  22. 22.

    & Can. J. Zool. 52, 959–976 (1974).

  23. 23.

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 25B, 989–1003 (1968).

  24. 24.

    Am. Zool. 21, 377–389 (1981).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA

    • Robb F. Leary
    • , Fred W. Allendorf
    •  & Kathy L. Knudsen

Authors

  1. Search for Robb F. Leary in:

  2. Search for Fred W. Allendorf in:

  3. Search for Kathy L. Knudsen in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/301071a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.