Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Association amacrine cells could mediate directional selectivity in pigeon retina

Abstract

Ganglion cell receptive fields in the vertebrate retina are classified as ‘simple’ if they display mutually antagonistic, concentric on and off responses to stimulation by light1, or ‘complex’ if they respond maximally to a stimulus which moves in a certain direction or has a particular orientation2. One complex unit frequently reported is directionally selective3–6. It is excited by stimuli moving through its receptive field in only one direction, the preferred direction, and is inhibited by motion in the reverse or null direction. In species such as cats and monkeys which have a predominantly simple centre-surround organization of ganglion cell receptive fields, there is a low ratio of conventional (amacrine cell) to ribbon (bipolar cell) synapses in the inner plexiform layer, while in species such as pigeons and frogs which have a large percentage of complex ganglion cell receptive fields, there is a high ratio of conventional to ribbon synapses. It is therefore thought that amacrine cells, which are laterally interconnecting neurones in the inner plexiform layer, form the complex ganglion cell receptive field7,8. Although quantitative electron microscopy of the inner plexiform layer has indicated that amacrine cells may form the complex receptive field properties of ganglion cells, it offers no clues to the particular morphology of amacrine cells involved. I have therefore now studied amacrine cells in pigeon retina using Golgi impregnation in both whole-mounted and radially sectioned material to see whether there is a correlation between the morphology of amacrine cells and the receptive fields of ganglion cells. In 30 Golgi-impregnated retinas, I have found many different morphological types of amacrine cell. One of these is so clearly different from all other amacrine cells that it requires the separation of pigeon amacrine cells into two distinct classes, those which lack axons (class I cells) and those which have axons (class II cells).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuffler, S. W. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 37–68 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lettvin, J. Y., Maturana, H. R., McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. H. Proc. Instn Radio Engrs Aust. 47, 1940–1951 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holden, A. L. J. Physiol., Lond. 270, 253–269 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maturana, H. R. 22nd int. Cong. physiol. Sci., Leyden, 170–178 (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1962).

  5. Maturana, H. R. & Frenk, S. Science 142, 977–979 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearlman, A. L. & Hughes, C. P. J. comp. Neurol. 166, 111–122 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowling, J. E. Proc. R. Soc. B170, 205–228 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubin, M. W. J. comp. Neurol. 140, 479–506 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cajal, S. R. (1933) as trans. in The Structure of the Retina (eds Thorpe, S. A. & Glickstein, M.) 76–92 (Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stell, W. K. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VII/2 (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wyatt, H. J. & Daw, N. W. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 613–626 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mariani, A. Association amacrine cells could mediate directional selectivity in pigeon retina. Nature 298, 654–655 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298654a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298654a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing