Abstract
Results from a collaborative study designed by the Glasgow 14C laboratory to assess experimental variability in radiocarbon dating are presented. A series of eight replicate samples from one tree were dated independently by 20 14C laboratories. While the results are in general agreement they reveal the existence of systematic bias and unexplained variability. Thus as a general guideline for users of 14C dates, quoted errors, particularly those derived solely on the basis of the counting procedure, should be multiplied by a factor of between 2 and 3.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baillie, M. G. L. & Hillam, J. Nature 270, 25–28 (1977).
Stuiver, M. Nature 273, 271–274 (1978).
De Jong, A. F. & Mook, W. G. Radiocarbon 22, 267–272 (1980).
Radiocarbon Laboratory List, Radiocarbon 22, 1130–1140 (1980).
Campbell, J. A. & Baxter, M. S. Nature 278, 409–413 (1979).
Stuiver, M. & Polach, H. A. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).
Stenhouse, M. J. & Baxter, M. S. Proc. l4C and Archaeology, Groningen (1981).
Kalbfleisch, J. G. Probability and Statistical Inference Vol. II (Springer, New York, 1979).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
International Study Group* An inter-laboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree rings. Nature 298, 619–623 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298619a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298619a0
This article is cited by
-
Accuracy vs. Precision: Understanding Potential Errors from Radiocarbon Dating on African Landscapes
African Archaeological Review (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.