Letter | Published:

Effects of orbital decay on satellite-derived lower-tropospheric temperature trends

Nature volume 394, pages 661664 (13 August 1998) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The 17-year lower-tropospheric temperature record derived from the satellite Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU)1,2,3 shows a global cooling trend, from 1979 to 1995, of −0.05 K per decade at an altitude of about 3.5 km (refs 4, 5). Air temperatures measured at the Earth's surface, in contrast, have risen by approximately +0.13 K per decade over the same period4,6. The two temperature records are derived from measurements of different physical parameters, and thus are not directly comparable. In fact, the lower stratosphere is cooling substantially (by about −0.5 K per decade)5, so the warming trend seen at the surface is expected to diminish with altitude and change into a cooling trend at some point in the troposphere. Even so, it has been suggested that the cooling trend seen in the satellite data is excessive4,7,8. The difficulty in reconciling the information from these different sources has sparked a debate in the climate community about possible instrumental problems and the existence of global warming4,7,9. Here we identify an artificial cooling trend in the satellite-derived temperature series caused by previously neglected orbital-decay effects. We find a new, corrected estimate of +0.07 K per decade for the MSU-based temperature trend, which is in closer agreement with surface temperatures. We also find that the reported7 cooling of the lower troposphere, relative to the middle troposphere, is another artefact caused by uncorrected orbital-decay effects.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Precise monitoring of global temperature trends from satellites. Science 247, 1558–1562 (1990).

  2. 2.

    & Precision and radiosonde validation of satellite gridpoint temperature anomalies. Part II: A tropospheric retrieval and trends during 1979–90. J. Clim. 5, 858–866 (1992).

  3. 3.

    & Satellite greenhouse signal. Nature 367, 325 (1994).

  4. 4.

    & Difficulties in obtaining reliable temperature trends: Reconciling the surface and satellite MSU2R trends. J. Clim.(in the press).

  5. 5.

    et al. (eds) Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1996)).

  6. 6.

    Recent warming in global temperature series. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 1149–1152 (1994).

  7. 7.

    & Spurious trends in satellite MSU temperatures from merging different satellite records. Nature 386, 164–167 (1997).

  8. 8.

    et al. Satellite and surface temperature data at odds? Clim. Change 30, 103–117 (1995).

  9. 9.

    , & How accurate are satellite ‘thermometers’? Nature 389, 342–342 (1997).

  10. 10.

    et al. Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 25679–25720 (1997).

  11. 11.

    Total solar irradiance trend during solar cycles 21 and 22. Science 277, 1963–1965 (1997).

  12. 12.

    Awell-calibrated ocean algorithm for special sensor microwave/imager. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8703–8718 (1997).

  13. 13.

    An updated model for millimeter wave propagation in moist air. Radio Sci. 20, 1069–1089 (1985).

  14. 14.

    Temporal inhomogeneities in radiosonde temperature records. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 3667–3676 (1994).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Remote Sensing Systems, 438 First Street, Suite 200, Santa Rosa, California 95401, USA

    • Frank J. Wentz
    •  & Matthias Schabel

Authors

  1. Search for Frank J. Wentz in:

  2. Search for Matthias Schabel in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank J. Wentz.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/29267

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.